Botticelli Loan at the Getty

Sandro Botticelli, Madonna of the Magnificat, late 1480s. Private collection
The Getty Museum is showing a version of Botticelli's Madonna of the Magnificat as a loan from a private collection. This is the painting that Christie's auctioned from the collection of Microsoft co-founder Paul G. Allen in Nov. 2022 (for $48 million). At the time, some Getty watchers wondered why the wealthy institution didn't buy it. Measuring just under 25 inches across, it's a half-size reduction of a famous painting in the Uffizi. Six studio replicas of the Uffizi picture are known, but only this one is considered to be largely autograph.

Detail of Madonna of the Magnificat

Also on view in the Getty's Renaissance galleries are Lucas Cranach the Elder's Adam and Eve, on loan from the Norton Simon Museum and making their first public appearance after a three-year conservation treatment. Among the challenges was the warped limewood support, riddled with wormholes and perhaps bullet holes. The new frames are thick enough to allow the panels to curve with time and climate. A missing part of Adam's head was reconstructed from a very similar Adam and Eve at that big box store of European painting, the Uffizi.

Adam and Eve will be on view at the Getty Center through Apr. 21, 2024. The Botticelli is on loan for six months.

Lucas Cranach the Elder, Adam and Eve, about 1530. Norton Simon Museum

Comments

Re the Cranachs: There's a sublime pair at the Art Institute that is a heartstopper. It's broad daylight, and Eve stands before a resting stag...

https://www.artic.edu/collection?q=adam+and+eve&artist_ids=Lucas+Cranach%2C+the+Elder
Anonymous said…
Possibility #1: The Getty is interested in acquiring the painting. A loan allows the Getty to study the painting.

Possibility #2: The owner wants some insurance relief. When on loan to a museum, the museum's insurance covers the painting against theft and damage.

--- J. Garcin
Anonymous said…
Thank you for the blog post. Now I can see why the Getty didn’t go for the painting considering this being one of 6 duplicates of a larger painting. On the other hand, I’m guessing it may have been one of the last chances for the Getty ever owning a Botticelli.
Anonymous said…
Buying subpar paintings by great artists never stopped the Getty before so who really knows...
Anonymous said…
I'm surprised the Getty didn't buy any of the other paintings in the collection. The Getty has over 8 billion dollars. Stop being stingy and buy some masterpieces while they're still available.
Anonymous said…
I would love to see the Getty purchase this painting. It is small, but nevertheless an outstanding work by Botticelli, certainly one of the greatest Renaissance painters. This would add immeasurably to the collection in terms of breadth, quality, and sheer aesthetic pleasure!
Anonymous said…
If not a purchase, I'd love to see the Getty take on the project of restoring Norton Simon's Botticelli which is in desperate need of a touch up.

Also, at $48M, it would have been have added much more to the collection than the $30M time share. The new President, Katherine Fleming, really needs to do more for the Getty and the city and build the collection now that she's had her first year to settle in.