A Norwegian Visionary for the Getty

Peder Balke, North Cape, about 1850. Getty Museum
The Getty Museum has purchased a night seascape by Norwegian Romantic painter Peder Balke (1804–1887). Sometimes known as the "Norwegian Turner," Peder was pupil of Johan Christian Dahl and met Caspar David Friedrich. By 1846 his international reputation was such that French king Louis Philippe I bought 30 of his paintings for the Palace of Versailles. By the mid 1850s however Balke abandoned the art market for socialism. He developed Balkeby, a utopian suburb for working people outside of Oslo. Balke continued to paint but not for the market. Many of the late paintings are experimental, small, and monochrome, drawing comparisons to Victor Hugo's visual art.

Balke was largely forgotten until shows at the National Gallery (2014) and Metropolitan Museum (2019). The Getty picture shows North Cape, one of the northernmost points in Europe and now a tourist attraction accessible by car. Balke visited it under more difficult conditions in 1832. North Cape became Balke's Mont Sainte-Victoire, repeated in numerous variations from memory. 

Peder Balke, The North Cape by Moonlight, 1848. Metropolitan Museum of Art
There is just one other Balke painting in an American museum, at the Metropolitan, and it's also a North Cape. The Getty painting, measuring about 16.5 by 21 in., is distinguished by its icy blue palette and use of impasto, for instance in the moon's reflection in the foreground. The picture was in the artist's family until last year. It's now on view in the Getty Center's gallery W201.
Detail of Getty North Cape
Georges Lemmen, Young Woman Crocheting (Julie Lemmen), 1890-1891. J. Paul Getty Museum
The Getty has also acquired an auction surprise by the little-known Belgian Neo-Impressionist Georges Lemmen. "Someone Just Made a Killing on This Obscure 19th-Century Painting" ran a May 2025 Artnet headline. They were speaking of Lemmen's 18-by-15 in. Young Woman Crocheting, auctioned by Sotheby's New York for $698,500. That was 10 times the high estimate. The picture has now turned up at the Getty, which says it purchased it from Gallery 19C.

Georges Lemmen (1865–1916) was a member of Les XX, the Belgian avant-garde group that included James Ensor and Fernand Khnopff. Each is prominently represented in the Getty collection. In 1887 Les XX showed Seurat's A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grand Jatte in Brussels. It came as a revelation to the group's artists, Lemmen included. He adopted a Pointillist style for two paintings of his sister Julie. The Getty picture (whose subject recalls Seurat's c. 1882 crayon drawing of his mother sewing, as well as precedents going back to Vermeer) was probably the first. The other, at the Art Institute of Chicago, is now displayed next to Seurat's masterpiece. 

A Seurat painting has long eluded the Getty. Young Woman Crocheting thus becomes the museum' only painting in the Pointillist idiom. Lemmen was admired for his ability to create psychologically convincing portraits from dots. He created only a few such paintings before abandoning Pointillism for Art Nouveau.

Young Woman Crocheting is on view in gallery W205.

Georges Lemmen, Portrait of the Artist's Sister, 1891. Art Institute of Chicago


Comments

Both excellent gets. Congratulations.
For 20+ years I never left the Met without stopping to admire "An Eruption of Vesuvius," of 1824, by Johan Christian Dahl (Norwegian, 1788–1857). It was always credited on the gallery card as a long-term loan from a private collection. And I was always mortified that on my next visit I would see it gone.
Then, in 2019, the private collector, Christen Sveaas, gifted it and many other northern masterpieces that he owned to the Met, in celebration of the museum's 150th anniversary.
All good things come to those who wait..sometimes.
*
By the way, the credit line for the Met's own Peder Balke, "The North Cape by Moonlight," of 1848: Gift of Christen Sveaas, in celebration of the Museum's 150th Anniversary, 2019
Anonymous said…
The Met's Balke to me is better than the Getty's Balke. The former is more technically sophisticated than the latter. Not sure if it means anything (either good or bad) that the Getty's work was owned by the Balke family until the end.

As for the Lemmen, the one in the Getty seems more interesting than the one in the AIC.
Re "The Met's Balke to me is better than the Getty's Balke.":
Agreed. The sea in the Met's picture is at once more black and luminous than the Getty's one.

Re "Not sure if it means anything (either good or bad) that the Getty's work was owned by the Balke family until the end.":
It may be incidental. I'd be more likely to think it relevant if it were a family member's portrait or somesuch.
The Getty website identifies its Balke as "Oil on paper mounted on canvas, 16 1/2 x 20 7/8 in."
That indeed IS significant.
Its size is also considerably smaller than the Met's Balke "North Cape," oil on canvas, which is 24 x 33 in.
Anonymous said…
... At this point in time, might as well close the door on Seurat, Caravaggio, and maybe Velazquez.

The Getty passed on Allen's Les Poseuses.

With these recent adds, the Getty seems to be bargain-shopping to round out the collection. If you are an aesthete or academic, these acquisitions make sense. If you are a tourist/casual, these acquisitions aren't going to motivate a return visit.

--- J. Garcin
Has Getty ever spent $150M on anything?
Yes, I expect that the halcyon days of purchasing your Caravaggios and Velasquezes in the market, private or otherwise, are done.
What's important is that LA do its best at marshalling art history within the scope of its obvious limits. LA will never ever be the end point for lovers of European painting..it's too late.
Most people see a museum collection only once anyway, so LA can give folks a real look at what's out there. Then it's up to the viewers to decide that studying more important collections is worth their time and effort.
LA and countless other American collections play a key role in this regard.
The price for Titian's portrait of Alfonso d'Avalos was reported to be about $70 million in 2003. That would be about $127 million in 2026 dollars. I suspect that's the most the Getty ever paid for a single object.

The largest group purchase was the set of 14 drawings (inc. a Michelangelo and a Degas pastel) and a Watteau painting in 2017. The New York Times estimated the cost at over $100 million (over $136 million today).
Artist said…
It is worth mentioning that the Getty's "Irises" by VG is estimated to be worth 200-300 miliion dollars today. It was purchased under 50 million in 1987.
Understood.
In contrast, they're riding their brakes today.
No way to get ahead.
Anonymous said…
Getty being so cheap don't want to buy true masterpieces, content with minor artists and 2nd rate works by major ones. With over a billion and growing in the bank - and still charges $25, maybe $30 now to park at their overrated museum.