Behold! Trump's Four Great American Artists

Exclusive: A ChatGPT render of all the American artists in the future "Garden of American Heroes"
(L to R: Ansel Adams, Charles Willson Peale, John Singer Sargent, Gilbert Stuart)  
The National Endowment for the Humanities is redirecting some canceled grant money to Donald Trump's planned "National Garden of American Heroes." The garden, a leftover idea from Trump's first term, would display "realistic" statues of "250 great individuals from America's past." The list of canonical heroes, released in January, includes Alex Trebek, John Wayne, and Whitney Houston. I can see Trump brainstorming those particular names at a meeting, but anyone who skims the full list will conclude that Trump didn't have too much to do with it. It's unlikely that a President famously averse to reading knows who Bernardo de Gálvez, John von Neumann, or Phillis Wheatley are (all on the list, and all immigrants, by the way). 

Particularly bizarre is the garden's small contingent of American artists. Excluding architects and filmmakers, there are barely half a dozen visual artists. One is Samuel Morse, but he's surely included as inventor of the telegraph rather than a portraitist. Also on the list are John James Audubon, Norman Rockwell, and Dr. Seuss, who might be classified as illustrators rather than artists per se. That leaves just four great American artists in the MAGA pantheon: Ansel Adams, Charles Willson Peale, John Singer Sargent, and Gilbert Stuart. 

Huh?

Comments

Zack said…
This is all so embarrassing. I hope the next president has the good sense to melt the statues down. It’s going to be a long and humiliating four years for our country.
Agreed. He, for his part, is incapable of embarrassment. So there's that.
Remember Project 2025? He told us so.
And the whirlwind continues.
Remember: the midterms.
Anonymous said…
> but anyone who skims the
> full list will conclude that
> Trump didn't have too much
> to do with it.

If the core of the idea was inspired by him, then the project is apparently now being guided or overseen by others.

In the case of LACMA, I wonder how much is due to Michael Govan, LACMA's board of trustees, LACMA's curators or Peter Zumthor?

The director of the Lucas Museum recently stepped down, and how much of that was due to personality, politics or personal taste too?

How much are cities like NYC in the east or San Francisco in the west affected by politics? Made better, made worse?
Politics is about the distribution of pain.
Anonymous said…
The next President should sell the statues and use the money to fund climate or women's health research. Of course, who would buy them?

... What a total waste of taxpayer money? Here's the fraud. It's a $200,000 commission for each of the statues, 250 of them.



Anonymous said…
A garden of non-abstract sculptures makes me think of the AMPAS museum (more literal than avant-garde), which was finally built after decades of talk and apathy. Meanwhile, George Lucas is creating a museum too, which will be generally very non-abstract too.

Then there is the matter of politics, also found in the world of arts, culture and throughout life in general. As with a San Francisco, the politics of LA may be affecting it too. It probably had some affect (at least when it comes to prevention and preparation) on the huge fires in January.

> Ben Affleck is providing
> some insight into why so
> much of the film and
> television industry seems
> to have moved out of
> Los Angeles and
> California as a whole.
Anonymous said…
Since SF was mentioned above, I could have added this as another footnote:

SF Standard, April 23: "....Saks Fifth Avenue in Union Square is closing, the company announced Wednesday....Macy’s impending exit and the grim state of the San Francisco Centre Mall have also been drags on the area’s recovery."