LACMA Receives Perenchio Collection + Bonus Gauguin

Paul Gauguin, Otahi, 1893

LACMA's collection website indicates that the museum has received the long-anticipated art collection of TV executive Jerry Perenchio (1930–2017). The gift of 48 Impressionist and Modern artworks spans paintings by Monet, Pissarro, Caillebotte, Cézanne, Toulouse-Lautrec, Bonnard, Léger, and Magritte; sculptures by Carpeaux, Degas, and Jasper Johns; finished pastels by Manet, Degas, Cassatt, and Vuillard; drawings by Picasso and Matisse; a chess set by Max Ernst. Forty-eight is one more than the 47 works that Perenchio promised. New to the gift is Paul Gauguin's Otahi, a painting as notorious for its eroticism as its role in a recent art market controversy. It becomes LACMA's only Tahiti-period Gauguin.

Perenchio's promised gift, announced in 2014, was conditioned on the timely opening of the Peter Zumthor building, then projected for 2023. Construction delays have led to concern that a missed deadline might scuttle the bequest. The gift has been described as LACMA's biggest ever donation of art, and its value was put at half a billion dollars (in 2014 dollars, and not including the expensive Gauguin). 

Otahi was one of the works purchased by Russian fertilizer magnate Dmitri Rybolovlev in his famous buying binge. Rybolovlev bought quickly and didn't sweat the price. He got buyer's remorse when he learned that Swiss dealer Yves Bouvier had paid only $80 million for Leonardo's Salvator Mundi before flipping it to him for $127.5 million about 2013. 

Rybolovlev had paid nearly as much for Otahi, $120 million, also via Bouvier. Despite its modest size (something over 19 by 28 inches) it was the most expensive Gauguin ever sold at the time. Even today, Wikipedia estimates Otahi to be the 27th most expensive painting of all time, in inflation-adjusted dollars. 

That comes with an asterisk. Rybolovlev, who was going through a messy divorce, sold Otahi through his Virgin Islands trust. The price was less than $50 million, a staggering loss. Rybolovlev decided he had been duped. He filed suit against Bouvier and deep-pocketed Sotheby's for allegedly participating in a scheme to overcharge him for art. 

In a decade-long series of lawsuits, courts of multiple nations sided with Bouvier and Sotheby's over Rybolovlev. Caveat emptor, and all that. Rybolovlev undercut his own case by reselling Salvator Mundi to Badr bin Abdullah al Saud for $450 million, copping a much bigger profit than those he was accusing Bouvier of.

It now appears that Otahi was Perenchio's last great purchase. The LACMA website does not have an image, but the Wildenstein Platner Institute's catalogue raisonné lists only one Gauguin painting by that name, and its dimensions and date coincide with those given on the LACMA site.

Perenchio may have been the anonymous collector who lent Otahi to the Portland Art Museum for a few months in 2015, a tactic that is often used to avoid paying sales taxes. Elaine Wynn did the same, also anonymously, with her Francis Bacon triptych in 2013–2014.

Otahi means "alone." With its isolation and implied voyeurism, the nearly nude figure has been interpreted as an homage to Degas' bathers or a taboo depiction of sexual submission. Gauguin deplored the effects of colonialism in Tahiti, oblivious to the posterity would see him as an embodiment of it. Otahi's minimalist landscape is as much a paradox as the figure that nearly blocks it out. Going by the Wildenstein image, the sherbet colors and shadows showcase Gauguin's skills as a colorist.

Otahi was extensively exhibited and published in the 20th century. It inspired a 2006 Vik Muniz photograph simulating Gauguin's painting as a heap of powdered pigment. However, aside from the Portland showing, it has not been seen publicly since a 1993 exhibition at the Musée d'Orsay. 

Paul Gauguin, Fruit Dish on a Garden Chair, 1890. LACMA, gift of Merle Oberon
LACMA has four other paintings by Gauguin, all probably made in Brittany. Fruit Dish on a Garden Chair was a gift of mid-century movie star Merle Oberon. Of part Sinhalese and Maori ancestry, Oberon concealed her Asian/Polynesian heritage in order to make it in Hollywood.

ICYMI: It's hard to overstate how much LACMA's collection of European modernism has been transformed by gifts announced or realized in just the past few months. Five separate donations of single works or whole collections have given LACMA its first Tahitian Gauguin and Cubist Picasso, plus its first-ever paintings by Manet, van Gogh, Klimt, Schiele, and Bacon

Comments

Anonymous said…
Perenchio supposedly conditioned his bequest on LACMA building the Zumthor structure. At the time, I winced. I had grown too accustomed to the 1965-1986 buildings.

I watched a video a few days ago taken by a person who walked through the main plaza around the Pereira and Hardy-Holzman-Pfeiffer galleries. Whoa. I forgot just how makeshift the setting really was. If the museum had the funds in 1986 and afterwards, they could have modified Pereira's campus in a more professional (or complete) way.

When a tourist from Minnesota several years ago posted a online review that compared LACMA unfavorably with the Minneapolis Institute of Art, I get what she meant. However, If the artworks from Perenchio fit the Broad building (modern, contemporary) better than in the Geffen, that will be ironic.

Regardless, they'll be among the more popular objects in the museum. If they're displayed in the Broad, that environment actually may be more complimentary to them than if they're in the darker, gray-concrete Geffen. Either way, something had to be done to 1960's "tract house" LACMA
Anonymous said…
Awesome, reassuring news. One hears a lot about the merits or lack thereof of the new Zumthor building, but at least in terms of the art going inside, it seems LACMA has been extremely successful since the project was decided. Ultimately, that's what should be most important.
Whoa! You go, LACMA.
I'm a-scared.
I don't understand. How is lending an artwork temporarily to a museum for a few months in any way connected to an owner's effort to avoid paying sales taxes?
Anonymous said…
Is the Gauguin the most significant work of the Perenchio collection? And how does it compare to Arii Matamoe at The Getty?
Anonymous said…
I vote the Degas "Song of the Dog" the best work in the Perenchio collection; has to have been one of the best Degas paintings er pastels left in private hands.
Re the "Song of the Dog": I quote from a November 6, 2014 article by
Linda Theung, editor of Modern Art, on this picture, as follows..
"Degas’s sophisticated palette and technical experimentation are at their best here: the picture is formed from layers of gouache, essence, and pastel over a monotype..."
Is this media combination found in no other work?
I have no idea how Degas achieved his final result. Is the support canvas?
If you buy an expensive artwork in New York and immediately ship it to your home out of state, you don't have to pay NY sales taxes. NY exempts art sales from tax to encourage the art business to stay in NY. But most states, including California, do charge a "sales tax" (more accurately known as a use tax) on the artwork, once a resident brings it in-state. The loophole, known as the "Norton Simon rule" because he used it, exploits the fact that Oregon and few other states don't charge a use tax. As long as the artwork is shipped to Oregon and stays there a certain number of months, it can then be shipped to California/most other states without having to pay the tax. It doesn't exactly make sense, but the tax code generally doesn't. I do get the sense that this has been a boon to the Portland Art Museum.

Here's a full explainer from the New York Times, with photo of Elaine Wynn's Bacon tryptch.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/13/business/buyers-find-tax-break-on-art-let-it-hang-awhile-in-portland.html
I've only seen a few Perenchio works in the flesh—maybe half a dozen were shown at LACMA after the gift was announced, and they weren't necessarily the "best." They did show Degas' Song of the Dog, which is indeed fantastic. That's a gouache and pastel on paper, so it can't be on permanent view. I'd say that Otahi rivals any of the Perenchio oil paintings, especially if you factor in the rarity of Polynesian Gauguins.

Otahi and the Getty's Arii Matamoe (The Royal End) are both from the first Tahitian period and both horizontal format, nearly the same size. The Getty's painting is dark and bizarre (in a good way), while Otahi is bright and more typical of what you might expect from Gauguin. I think it does a good job of encapsulating the appeal and contradictions of Gauguin's art. Incidentally, there's one more Tahitian Gauguin in greater L.A., at the Norton Simon Museum. Tahitian Woman and Boy is later, from the second Tahitian sojourn. Both subjects are amply dressed, allowing a wonderful contrast between the woman's rose gown and the yellow-green backdrop.
Anonymous said…
> That's a gouache and
> pastel on paper, so it
> can't be on permanent
> view.

That made me think of all the windows and sunlight in the Geffen Galleries.

Perenchio's collection being installed in the Broad rather than the Geffen may be the best outcome. Or will BCAM return to being contemporary only? However, I'd rather not have hipster-trendy stuff taking up more space than necessary. As it is, there's often contemporary also in the Resnick

Most of the works from Perenchio are in the category of modern, and before 2020 the Ahmanson - not the Broad building - housed it. If that format doesn't change, BCAM versus Geffen will pose an interesting duality.

Artworks that tend to be more popular will be hosted by the old kid on the block, artworks that are more for the connoisseur will be hosted by the new kid on the block.

Regardless, even if most of Perenchio's donation ends up in the older building instead of the Geffen, their being housed in the provisional-looking layout of the 1965-1986 campus wouldn't have been ideal for both it and the other collections of LACMA.
I've never found the law's greatest virtue to be its fairness.
Tax exemptions for non-city residents' purchases shipped out of state are accepted practice. But I had no idea that such goods were not subject to the state-tax portion also, in addition to the city tax.
Boola Boola for Portland, I suppose, but New Yorkers pay the highest or near highest taxes in the country. When someone rolls their eyes as I go into my income inequality riffs, I'll use this example.
We've got New Yorkers eating dented cat food. This is disgraceful. I'm talking to you, NYS legislators.
I think I get it now.
Per Blick Art Supplies:

Ask the Experts: "I have seen "essence on paper"
listed as the medium on works by Degas. What is
"essence"? Is it a type of paint?"
A: "Essence" refers to oil paint that has been been
deliberately underbound and thinned heavily with
solvents. "Peinture à l'essence" is not very common
today, but several key Impressionists favored this
technique because it offered the immediacy of watercolor
and gouache, while allowing the artist to avoid the
cockling and saturation caused by water-based media.
Oil paint is not normally considered suitable for direct use
on paper because drying oils can induce darkening and
embrittlement. In order to prepare oil paints for use as
essence, the artist typically deposits the color on an
absorbent material like blotter paper and allows the heavy
stock to wick away a large portion of vehicle. The oil-
starved paint is gathered up and mixed with solvent like
turpentine for use on paper. The modified paint can be
further thinned to a very light wash, as thin as watercolor.
Essence sets up to a semi-solid consistency very quickly,
an advantage for mixed techniques with drawing media.
Depending on the solvent used, wax-based colored
pencils can soften and intermix with this interesting
medium. Graphite, charcoal and pastel are also natural
pairings with essence.
Essence should be used on paper or porous board,
supports with a permeable weave which can hold this
light, underbound paint; applications should be thin, like
watercolor or gouache. Thick layers may powder off or
flake. Essence lacks sufficient binder for use on canvas,
panel and other typical oil painting supports.
As with any technique involving solvents, painting in
essence requires adequate ventilation, and should only
be used with appropriate protective measures, away from
flame or sources of ignition.
Anonymous said…
It's been my experience that out-of-state galleries do not report all purchases to CA auditors. That's another loophole.