How LACMA Got a van Gogh
| Installation view of "Collecting Impressionism at LACMA" with Tarascon Stagecoach |
| Actor Edward G. Robinson and wife Gladys pose with van Gogh's Portrait of Pére Tanguy (1887) in a 1949 beer ad. A few years later the couple divorced, selling their art collection |
Van Gogh was popular with West Coast collectors. Hollywood stars Edward G. Robinson, Errol Flynn, Elizabeth Taylor, and Barbra Streisand each owned van Gogh paintings. Industrialist Norton Simon bought six van Goghs, and oilman Armand Hammer had four.
When LACMA opened as a separate, art-focused museum in 1965, much of the Simon collection was on loan. It was easy to read that as a sign that Simon's collection would eventually go to LACMA. But Simon never made any promises.
Armand Hammer did, pledging his collection to LACMA. There was even hope—nothing more than that—that Palm Springs resident Walter Annenberg's collection (five van Goghs) or part of it might come to LACMA.
It didn't happen. Instead we have a Simon Museum in Pasadena and a Hammer Museum in Westwood. The Annenberg collection went to New York, and the movie stars' van Goghs were dispersed in divorces and financial reverses.
| George Gard DeSylva. Photo: Bob Landry |
| van Gogh, Chestnut Trees in Flower: Pink and White Blossoms, 1890. Private collection, formerly collection of George Gard DeSylva |
![]() |
| van Gogh, The Postman Joseph Roulin, 1888. LACMA |
One of the DeSylva drawings is a large (over 16 by 20-in.) ink portrait of Vincent's postman bro, Joseph Roulin. It records the composition of the famous painting in Boston.
Tarascon Stagecoach had no prior connection to Los Angeles. It's an unusual subject: Americans associate stagecoaches with the Old West, not the south of France. Van Gogh took the idea from Alphonse Daudet's 1872 novel, Tartarin de Tarascon, a boisterous satire in the spirit of Don Quixote. One section is narrated by a stagecoach, recounting its existence from a working conveyance in Tarascon, France, to being torn up for firewood in North Africa.
| Vincent van Gogh, letter to Theo, Oct. 13, 1888. Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam |
Tarascon also figures in one of van Gogh's best-known quotes. In a letter to brother Theo, Vincent describes and sketches Tarascon Stagecoach:
"Why, I say to myself, should the spots of light in the firmament be less accessible to us than the black spots on the map of France? Just as we take the train to go to Tarascon or Rouen, we take death to go to a star…"
![]() |
| van Gogh, Sunflowers, 1888. Munich Pinakothek |
| Detail of Tarascon Stagecoach |
Thanks to the letter, Tarascon Stagecoach's existence has long been known. Its whereabouts were a mystery to the north-of-the-equator art world, though.
| Medardo Rosso, Self-Portrait in the Studio, after 1901 |
The painting had been owned by Medardo Rosso (1858–1928), the proto-Modern Italian sculptor. Rosso hung Tarascon Stagecoach in his Paris studio. The reaction was so negative, even in Rosso's avant-garde circle, that he consigned it to the attic. One of the few friends who liked Tarascon Stagecoach was Uruguayan painter Milo Beretta (1875–1935). Rosso gave him the van Gogh when Beretta moved back to his homeland in 1895. It became the first known van Gogh in the Americas.
In 1906 Rosso wrote Beretta to make sure he knew that van Goghs had gone way up in value. He said the painting might be worth (Dr. Evil pinkie…) $4000.
A 1935 exhibition in Montevideo drew attention to Tarascon Stagecoach as a locally held and valuable painting. In 1941 the Museum of Modern Art traded two Cézannes and a Toulouse-Lautrec for Starry Night. Though no dollar value was set, it demonstrated van Gogh's ascendance to the top of the Post-Impressionist market. The spiraling valuations ramped up anxiety for Beretta's six daughters. They placed the painting in a Montevideo bank vault for safekeeping. Eventually they decided to sell it to South American dealer Paul de Koenigsberg.
One of De Koenigsberg's clients was Henry Pearlman, a Brooklyn-born Jewish businessman who had made a modest fortune in marine refrigeration—keeping fish and other perishables fresh at sea. As a collector he was self-taught and not nearly as wealthy as some of his contemporaries. De Koenigsberg asked Pearlman whether he might be interested in an expensive painting. Pearlman said yes and, upon seeing the van Gogh, concluded a deal in an hour and a half.
Pearlman agreed to swap a Chaim Soutine, two Renoirs, four lesser paintings, plus some cash for the van Gogh. He immediately regretted giving up the Soutine and bought it back the next day. But he kept the van Gogh, the prize of his collection.
![]() |
| Henry Pearlman in his office. The Manet Young Woman in a Round Hat (right) has been promised to LACMA |
Henry seems not to have had a clear vision for the future of his art holdings. After his 1974 death, his wife Rose decided to put the couple's collection on loan to Princeton's University Art Museum. Neither Henry nor Rose had attended Princeton.
Norton Simon might have played an indirect role in the loan. In 1972 Simon announced that he was putting his art collection on a year-long loan to Princeton University Art Gallery. He hinted that the loan might become permanent. But Simon disappointed Princeton much as he had LACMA. In 1974 he negotiated a deal to take over the financially troubled Pasadena Museum and move his collection west. With empty galleries to fill, Princeton might have been especially receptive to Rose's offer, even if it too was only a loan.
The Pearlman collection ended up being on view at Princeton for half a century. After Rose died in 1994, the Pearlman Foundation passed to the couple's descendants. They approved frequent loans to museums on both sides of the Atlantic.
Daniel Edelman, Henry and Rose's grandson and the Foundation's president, spoke to museum directors nationwide about finding a permanent home for the collection. Michael Govan's pitch for LACMA must have started with the museum's extraordinary need. LACMA, the flagship museum of America's second largest city, had no van Gogh painting.
Ultimately the Pearlman Foundation elected to distribute its entire collection to three institutions. The Museum of Modern Art got the Cézanne paintings and watercolors; the Brooklyn Museum got the largest number of works, including the Modiglianis and Soutines; and LACMA got just five works. Yet the LACMA gift is the most consequential for its recipient. Besides a long-sought van Gogh, it got a Manet (its first), a Sisley (its second), a Toulouse-Lautrec (its second and related to its first, donated by the DeSylvas), and a sculpture by Wilhelm Lembruck (its first).
![]() |
| van Gogh, Orchard Bordered by Cypresses, 1888. Ex Paul Allen collection, auctioned by Sotheby's in 2022 |
In 2022 the estate of Microsoft billionaire Paul Allen auctioned a middling van Gogh landscape for a record $115 million, more than any museum in the world would likely be willing or able to pay. The price testifies to the short supply of museum-worthy van Gogh paintings. It's one of the first Arles paintings and not at the level of those the artist would be making a few months later, such as Tarascon Stagecoach.
So how did LACMA get its van Gogh? As Henry Pearlman wrote, "Luck plays a large part in building up a collection." If Medaro's circle hadn't hated Tarascon Stagecoach… if Medaro hadn't given it to an artist bound for the art market's antipodes… if Pearlman hadn't accepted de Koenigsberg's offer immediately… if Pearlman hadn't neglected to name a permanent home for collection (which surely would have been on the East Coast)… Tarascon Stagecoach probably would have ended up somewhere else.
![]() |
| Henry Pearlman's office with Tarascon Stagecoach and works by Modigliani, Cézanne, and Renoir |





Comments
When the Geffen building had a preview several months ago, a lot more comments about it were on a Facebook account (devoted to the subject of LACMA?---but I'm not sure) that I otherwise never visit. But I doubt it's nearly as substantial as this blog is.
This blog
> that van Gogh intended for
> his Yellow House.
The work at least was more significant in the eyes of the artist than I knew about or realized.
> The painting's most daring
> feature is the brushy blue-white
> foreground.
That's the main aspect of the work that I have middling reactions to. The foreground to me makes the painting seem unbalanced or incomplete. But, okay, to each his own.
> DeSylva and wife gave much
> of that collection to the Los
> Angeles County Museum,
> then in Exposition Park.
LA has an ironic or "what the hell?!" type history. Not having a separate location for an art museum as recently as the 1960s meant LA was more marginal than lots of other cities were throughout the US.
I just read that even earlier on, in the early 1900s, the cultural profile of another aspect of LA was even more incomplete than Seattle's was. Of course, San Francisco has long given a greater sense of cultural-economic maturity too. But the entertainment industry partly (or largely?) lifted "Hollywood"-LA-Southern California from occupying a more secondary role.
However, LA is sort of to the US, what America is to Europe. Culture, prestige and prosperity were originally east of the Atlantic, not west of it. But the upstart new world, symbolized by 1776, soon outdid its ancestral homeland---and more Americans (at least east of the Mississippi) trace their family lineage to Europe than South America or Asia.
Now in 2026, the Geffen Galleries and Lucas Museum will coincide with the region's entertainment industry - in an AI world - going downhill even further. So yin-yang.
^^ Fading of reds/violets. Van Gogh (and many of his contemporaries) used at least two red pigments that haven't held up, geranium lake and red lead. He used still other reds that have fared better, as seen in the stagecoach's central, tomato-red band.
Tarascon Stagecoach is in "Collecting Impressionism at LACMA" until "Village Square" opens in Feb. It will then move to that show, also in the Resnick, and travel with it to Brooklyn.
My guess is that "Collecting Impressionism"'s one Perenchio work, Monet's The Artist's Garden, Vétheuil, will be moved to a future full installation of the Perenchio gift, presumably in the Geffen Galleries.
Isn't there an opening now at our local paper for art critic?
I'm just saying...