Rodin Garden Redux

Auguste Rodin, The Shade (modeled about 1880, enlarged about 1901, 1969 cast) and Marsyas [Torso of "The Falling Man"] (modeled 1880s, 1970 cast). LACMA, gifts of B. Gerald Cantor Art Foundation
LACMA is reinstalling its Rodin sculpture garden north of Wilshire, outside the David Geffen Galleries. The works are posthumous bronze casts donated by financier B. Gerald Cantor and wife Iris from 1973 to 1990. 

L–R: Tony Smith's Smoke and Rodin's Jean de Fiennes, Monument to Balzac, Orpheus, and The Prodigal Son


Comments

The hanging letters suspended from beneath the concrete deck are a nice touch.
Anonymous said…
What's with the scraggly lawn? Yea, the grounds are still a work in progress, but having to second guess what Govan and his crew are doing (or not doing) isn't ideal for LACMA.

People managing the museum who should be skilled when it comes to so-called aesthetics but who themselves may not be as professional (or sophisticated) as they should be, however, goes back decades. Not helped by the museum's budget (eg, historically modest endowment fund) and late start (ie, 1965).

I recall their original campus, including grounds and galleries, looking makeshift. Things like empty planters or work material stacked against outside walls, exhibit spaces set up in a funky way. Or just the opposite of what a top-notch museum (certainly physically) should be all about.

And after looking at Peter Zumthor's concrete-wall galleries in Europe, I wouldn't have immediately said, "that's what I want!"

William Pereira in 1965 was described as a compromise (Mies van der Rohe was the first choice), while Peter Zumthor in the 2020s is a choice of Michael Govan.

Oh, well, history may not repeat itself but it often rhymes.


Anonymous said…
The landscaping is not complete. There is a rendering of the concept plan.
Anonymous said…
The landscaping leaves a lot to be desired. Too much hardscape and grass. I would’ve preferred more trees especially colorful ones like jacarandas or succulents that would stand out against all the drab concrete
Anonymous said…
I saw another video of the concrete-wall museum galleries designed by Zumthor, and unless the tinted-color concrete of some rooms in the Geffen offset spaces reminiscent of a warehouse, LACMA in April-May is going to have its fair share of cynics and detractors.

However, 2026 will be better than 1965 in one major way: Exhibit areas won't be chopped up and spread between 4 different floors and 2 different buildings. Although the Geffen split from the Resnick is similar to the Ahmanson split from the Hammer. So the era of Zumthor will be still somewhat similar to the era of Pereira too.
Anonymous said…
CUT TO: Alternate timeline
“Too many jacarandas or succulents – looks so busy and sloppy against the concrete.”
Anonymous said…
Hardscape has something to do with the foundation of the building. Michael Govan talked about this - that because of the tar in Hancock Park they have to make sure tar won't sip or leak into or near the building.
And that is why more concrete around. I wish there are more green space around it specially near the area between the Japanese pavilion and David Geffen Galleries.
My questions reveal I'm an outsider: Are the Japanese Pavilion and the Resnick Pavilion on opposite sides of the street?
Then the David Geffen Galleries are straddling that street?
So there are still 3 (or more?) buildings that one has to visit to see the entire collection? Luckily, the weather is clement year-round.
The Japanese and Resnick Pavilions are both north of Wilshire, separated by the north lobe/whatever of the Geffen Galleries.
To see the whole museum you would visit the Broad Contemporary Art Museum and the Resnick Pavilion (now); plus the Geffen Galleries (opening Apr. 19 for members, May 4 otherwise); and the Japanese Pavilion (reopening date to be announced). All except the Geffen Galleries are completely north of Wilshire.
Ah, understood. Great thanks.
[That's a lot of drama.]