Lucas Updates Website

The Lucas Museum of Narrative Art has updated its website with new photos of the essentially complete Ma Yansong building and campus. Also online are hi-res images of a selection of works in the collection. 

The Lucas opens Sep. 22, 2026.


Rendering of Library

Jacob Lawrence, "The Ant and the Grasshopper," illustration for Aesop's Fables, 1969. (c) 2026 The Jacob and Gwendolyn Knight Lawrence Foundation

Harlem Renaissance artist Jacob Lawrence produced a set of 23 black-and-white illustrations for a 1970 edition of Aesop's Fables published by Simon & Schuster. The original, large-format (29 by 23 in.) ink drawings were previously owned by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen and lent to a 2013 show at the Hallie Ford Museum of Art, Willamette University. The drawings augment lithographs and a tempera painting by the artist in the Lucas collection.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I notice some of the listed works are described as on loan. I didn't think so early on in the game, the Lucas would need to borrow works in order to fill out its galleries. Just as LACMA since 2020 hasn't made much of an effort to include many items from its own collection (which isn't modern/contemporary), I wonder if the Lucas is going to do a version of the same thing?

But instead of inserting contemporary works on loan and not bothering with the permanent collection, will the Lucas insert a lot of "narrative" borrowed from outside sources and ignore a lot of its own Star Wars material?

A large portion of visitors to the Lucas will be likely most interested in the owner's output from the movie franchise he made famous.

As for LACMA, I wonder how many of its visitors are more interested in contemporary art compared with works from older periods and of other formats?
Re: "As for LACMA": I want the whole encyclopedia.
Many of the works credited "loan from a private collection" have previously been identified as owned by George Lucas. My guess is that all the "loans" shown on the site are from Lucas' or Hobson's personal collection. It is notable that only a few pieces are owned outright by the Lucas Museum—one is the Colescott "George Washington Carver Crossing the Delaware."
Anonymous said…
^ That's what I was guessing, thinking it may be a legal-technical arrangement that allows Lucas and his wife to have greater control over what is or isn't exhibited.

Even among the closest of friends, relatives or colleagues, things can get sticky or messy.

When MOCA on Grand Ave was being planned, one of its original major supporters got into a big fight with who should or shouldn't be the architect and pulled out at the last moment. I believe a variation of the same thing occurred in the early 1960s when LACMA was being planned.

> whole encyclopedia.

After seeing the special-exhibition schedule for the past few years of the Metropolitan, I totally got why art critic Christoper Knight has been so dismissive of Govan and his management of LACMA.

Before then, I gave the museum more slack because its budget is much smaller and the Geffen is making that even worse. But then it occurred to me how the Resnick Pavilion since 2020 has had way too many displays of on-loan contemporary art. Meaning that Govan and his people have been spending even more money than they have to.

Although loans of contemporary art and temporary exhibits of it do cost way less than big-time shows, they still cost more than displays of a museum's own permanent collection.