David Geffen Galleries: First Look

Modern art curator Stephanie Barron shows off Matisse's ceramic mural La Gerbe, 1953. Fun fact: the space is named for Mellody Hobson and George Lucas

LACMA is holding media previews for its David Geffen Galleries. Some of my first takes on the museum's new permanent collection wing:

Zumthor's building. I'm OK with the concrete, I love Reiko Sudo's curtains, and the stairway isn't steep, it only looks that way.

In all Peter Zumthor has delivered on the promised experiential qualities. The Wilshire overpass melds city and museum, letting you hover just above the metropolis.

European Renaissance and Medieval sculpture

Eucharistic Urn in the Form of a Pelican, Potosi, Bolivia, about 1760
Dog, Colima, Mexico, 200 BCE–500 CE

The outer ("terrace") spaces, near the windows, rock. Many ceramic and sculptural works are shown on handsome casework tables without glazing. The result is nothing short of spectacular. The winsome little dog of ancient Colima, a popular favorite, inhabits your own space under perfect light. It's not like seeing it in a museum, it's more like having it in a sunny corner of your home. 

(I just hope they know what they're doing. I'm less concerned about theft than the inquisitive fingers of the next generation of art lovers. It's said the tables' dimensions have been engineered for safety.)

Core gallery installation with Issey Miyake's Plastic Body, 1980–1981 (right) and Robert Mapplethorpe's 1982 photograph of Lisa Lyons wearing the Miyake. This is an example of a black-tinted wall

The enclosed "core" galleries, with the tinted walls, are deeply weird, in a good way. It's a museum setting unlike any other you've experienced. Call it Zen-like or Goth or Zumthoresque. 

Courtyard gallery of African textiles and African-American quilts

The in-between "courtyard" galleries are hit and miss. In the right slant of light, with brightly colored art, they work. More often, they're left in murky shadow. It's hard for your eyes to adjust with the terrace galleries' sunlight in your peripheral vision.

Hubert Robert, Stair and Fountain the Park of a Roman Villa, about 1775

Glare is a problem for Elaine Wynn's great Bacon triptych and also for most of the works on paper and textiles outside the core galleries. The chrome curtains may help but don't eliminate the issue. There's even glare on some unglazed oil paintings, such as the big Hubert Robert park scene.

Silhouettes of Hindu deities

The flipside of glare is silhouetting, when you view works against the blaring L.A. light. In most cases you can position yourself to avoid glare and silhouetting, but that's a distraction.  

Govan's installation philosophy. Michael Govan decreed thematic and ever-changing displays of the permanent collection. As I said in a 2024 post, a thematic strategy works well enough at the Museum of Modern Art. But I was skeptical of how well it could work with LACMA's wider-ranging but far spottier collection.

I'm delighted to report that the 78 themes on view here are smart, interesting, and fresh. Introductory text panels don't talk down to the audience, and they can quote Barthes without sounding like pretentious AI. In fact, the themes are more art-wonk than populist ("The Evolution of Abstract Painting in Modern Korea"; "Indigenismo in Latin America"; "In Conversation: James McNeil Whistler and Japan").

Lauren Halsey, Sphinx, 2026

There are contemporary pieces in almost every installation, even among archaeological objects. Mostly it works, as the themes often treat the persistence of artistic concerns across time. The Lauren Halsey Sphinx adds scale to LACMA's second- and third-rate collection of Egyptian antiquities. Incidentally, there's another monumental Halsey relief and a Tavares Strachan bust, both new to the collection. 

It was said that the Geffen would have 2500 to 3000 objects on view. That was dialed back to "over 2000," and at the media preview Govan called it "2000 and counting." (Talk about your incredible shrinking museum.) In any case, these are respectable numbers for a U.S. art museum that's not the Metropolitan.  

My biggest concern with the thematic philosophy is that it might leave too much of the best, most representative, and most interesting art off view. To be shown, an object must fit a theme, and this presumably leaves some worthy objects to fall between the cracks. I'll have to reserve judgment on this until I'd have a chance to see the installation in full. 
Gustave Surand, St. George and the Dragon, 1888. LACMA
Here's one clunker they did find room for, Gustave Surand's St. George and the Dragon. It's a hoot, but it might work better at the Lucas Museum than LACMA. 

I didn't expect to see Buddhist art in the Geffen, for that's in "Realms of the Dharma" in the Resnick Pavilion through July 12. But there's a truly amazing core gallery of Buddhist art, anchored by the museum's great collection of Tibetan furniture. There are also installations of Japanese art, with the Japanese Pavilion still closed.

Perenchio gifts by Monet, Gauguin, Degas, and Caillebotte
Perenchio gifts and more. The collection has improved considerably since the East Campus was torn down. A big reason is the Perenchio gift of Impressionist and Modern art, being shown in full for the first time. Museums generally avoid organizing art by donor, but most are happy to make an exception for a temporary installation introducing a new gift.

The red tint in the Perenchio room is Venetian red, a velvety pigment associated with Titian but used by artists from Jan van Eyck onward. Zumthor's red rooms remind me of Matisse's The Red Studio, in which the artist used Venetian red to incorporate chromatically adventurous paintings into a gesamtkunstwerk. 
Edward Hicks, Peaceable Kingdom (Pensive Lion), 1846–1847
Maria and Conrad Janis gave a collection of modern and folk art in 2024. This Hicks is the most significant early American painting that LACMA has acquired in decades.
Guarani artists, Franciscan missions, Cabinet and Writing Desk, 18th century

Being shown for the first time is this 18th-century Paraguayan cabinet, a gift of the 2022 Collectors Committee.

Loans. One of Govan's talking points was the possibility of securing long-term loans from large foreign museums. It's an appealing idea, but I didn't see much evidence of it. I noticed two ancient Egyptian pieces from the Brooklyn Museum. That's worth pursuing: Brooklyn probably has Egyptian antiquities in its storeroom that would outclass anything on the West Coast.

Navigation. It's not easy to find your way around. I suggest ignoring the "oceans" and focusing on the city views for navigation.

"Turmoil and Optimism in Latin America" assembles avant-garde art and design from the 1950s to 1970s

Within a few months, van Gogh's Tarascon Stagecoach has hopscotched from two exhibitions in the Resnick to the Geffen installation. To the right is Gauguin's The Red Cow
Jeff Koons, Split-Rocker, 2000

Here's a Geffen's-eye view of the Jeff Koons topiary.

This is the least engaging view out the Geffen windows. Let's hope the trees will give the neighbors some privacy.

Alexander Calder, Three Quintains (Hello Girls), 1964 

Here's the reinstalled Calder mobile, commissioned by the museum for its 1965 opening on Wilshire Boulevard.

Comments

No. Just no.
I was looking for other museums with LACMA's concrete profile.
Google search Tadao Ando's Benesse Museum in Japan. Although, I don't see evidence that, there, they have used their walls' concrete as an actual backdrop for their art displays.
There's nothing wrong with LACMA's concrete wall construction, per se, except that they are using it to display an important art collection. If the only art on display were pedestaled sculptures in the round, I'd have less objections. As it is, it's as appealing as a salt mine.
The example of a black-tinted wall in your feature is superb.
The Potosi Eucharistic Urn in the Form of a Pelican is riveting.
On security: It's a red-letter day for the museum security guard industry.
I adore no vitrines, but I predict a lot of loud choruses: "NO TOUCHING, PLEASE!"
Anonymous said…
I notice your comment about reserving judgement until you've seen the installation in full - does this mean the building is incomplete or that they didn't finish installing every gallery before opening?
Anonymous said…
> I'll have to reserve judgment
> on this until I'd have a chance
> to see the installation in full.

I was browsing LACMA's online list of European art and a lot of it was marked as "not on view." But that did include also the de la Tour and a Rembrandt, which I know are on display, so I'm not sure if the museum's technical crew has updated everything.

Seeing all the "not on view" really annoyed me because certain photos of the Geffen look like there's more blank wall space and open floor areas than what I'd consider ideal. In one image, Todd Gray's "Octavia's Gaze" is shown displayed not far from a large blank gray concrete wall.

So does Govan and his staff think gray plain concrete is a visual respite?

Although I didn't like the idea of space outside of BCAM and Resnick being set aside for contemporary art, I now just want the Geffen to not look like the museum has more square footage than artworks. I recall even sections of the Ahmanson Gallery made me feel that way.

It's the opposite effect of the gargantuan old-time museums of the world where everything but the kitchen sink seems to be on display.

The lower level of the Simon Museum has so much of its Indian-Southeastern-Asian art, mainly sculptures, to browse through, it can become visually fatiguing or overwhelming. In such locations, I'd almost welcome contemporary interspersed with older art or, of course (most people's favorite), Impressionist paintings, etc.

As for Zumthor's display units, I sure hope they won't tip over in an earthquake. To me, they look flimsy, and that goes triple if the objects sitting on them aren't latched down either. I'd be really surprised if objects with a rounded or bowl-like bottom are affixed to the tables.

But I can see the different paradigm of looking at items reminiscent of being in the comfort of one's living room compared with a museum that's so visually heavy, it's similar to being in a room where someone is wearing way too much perfume.

All I know is places similar to the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (much less a Met, National Gallery, Louvre), have been like getting hit with a blast of cold water, a wake-up call that LACMA since 1965 has been asleep at the wheel.

LACMA and the Geffen Galleries have weaknesses that are a variation of Pereira 1965 (eg, lack of space for staffers, conservation, storage), but the museum before 2020 was even more not ready for prime time.
Installation appears to be complete except for the Damascus period room (which looks about half complete). But there wasn't enough time in the media preview to see everything, even as quick walk through
The vitrines that face the outside glass are canceled out by glare. Can LACMA furnish black umbrellas? But an unfortunate somebody may poke their eye out.
Anonymous said…
Important tapestries were displayed on stone walls in medieval castles. Important frescoes were painted over concrete/stone walls in ancient Roman villas and Renaissance churches/monasteries . Today, at the Yale Art Gallery (Kahn building) important paintings hang on a masonry wall.

Is the Kahn building a salt mine? Are Roman villas? ... If we start with the cave paintings, humans have been hanging art on stone/concrete longer than they have been hanging art on velvet or white walls.

--- J. Garcin
Anonymous said…
> it's as appealing as
> a salt mine.

Lots of traditionalists (which I've been when the Beaux-Arts-enfilade format was preferred by me) and connoisseur-type visitors to museums will probably be non-plussed about the Geffen. But the person who gave a negative online review of LACMA compared with her Minneapolis Institute of Art might not be as dismissive of Goff-Piano-Zumthor as she was of Pereira-Hardy/Holzman/Pfeiffer.

This image makes me wince:

https://p-news-upload.storage.googleapis.com/2023/06/lacma3-e1686936818203.jpg

If LACMA's main buildings were created in the early 1900s in the Beaux-Arts tradition (with galleries to match), then their demolition would have been pathetic. The Ahmanson Gallery's atrium was also no match for the impressive old-time entry spaces that exist in lots of museums created in the early 1900s (or before) in both large and small cities throughout the US.
Anonymous said…
The only review I’ve been waiting for (aside from Oliver Wainwright’s in The Guardian). Can’t wait to see it for myself and how it changes over each visit.
mughound said…
Using the "Turmoil and Optimism in Latin America" photo as an example, the concrete rooms do work and they work better when they utilize the abundant floor space. In some photos, where the floors are empty, the hanging objects sometimes look exposed and vulnerable like they're being lined up against a wall. For this building especially with expansive-feeling concrete rooms, it would benefit from more floor space utilization.

What's kind of jarring is the lack of floor-bolted metal barriers in front of precious artwork including the Van Gogh, and tables where objects usually behind glass cases are just sitting there. They look vulnerable, where I'm sure it was done to be more accessible. It'll take some time to get used to the privilege of being so close, just from never having seen them displayed like that.

The commissioned works by Pedro Reyes, Do Ho Suh, Jeff Koons, and Sara Rosalena are all great additions from what I see in the photos being posted. I love the placement of the Calder in relation to the building. It's an improvement from its previous location.

There's not much out there concerning the space underneath the building and what they've done with all this added public space. I see a palm tree here and there and the sculpture garden, but I really hope they did something more with it where people will want to walk around and leisure.

There's an Erewhon cafe for the instagram crowd who can selfie their smoothies in front of the street lamps. A smoothie costs $20. Did LACMA really need to make a visit more expensive with the ticket costs already being $30? Not even a gesture. Erewhon is famously ridiculed for their out-of-touch prices.
Where did I see El Anatsui's metal tapestry draped perpendicularly, bent around a curve? Was it designed as such, or was that cleverness on LACMA's part?
Re "Is the Kahn building a salt mine? Are Roman villas? ...": No. The issue is the muddled color mess of the bare walls.
Tint. That'll do it.
El Anatsui has said that he doesn't dictate how to hang his art, and it's OK if it looks different at different showings
Anonymous said…
> (aside from Oliver
> Wainwright’s in The
> Guardian).

The Guardian:
It’s a treat to sit and watch the world go by from this elevated perch, and Bruce Goff’s eccentric pavilion for Japanese art has never looked so wondrously life-giving next to all the grey concrete. [End quote]

It didn't occur to me how the old Pereira buildings didn't make a good foreground or background for the Bruce Goff structure. I just saw an image of it in the context of the Geffen, and, yep (and as with the Calder once sort of hidden below the old cafeteria), it now doesn't come off as misplaced as it once did.

> Where did I see El Anatsui's
> metal tapestry...?

When the museum had it on display last year, they switched the angle:

https://unframed.lacma.org/sites/default/files/attachments/scroll%202.jpg

As for all the gray concrete walls, I think there are too many of them. Although W. Poundstone thinks otherwise, I believe more of the outer walls should be tinted, not just the walls in the "houses."

However, I now have a sense that too much wall and floor space isn't used for displaying objects. Although the clutter of a traditional encyclopedia museum can be visually oppressive too, the opposite extreme (at least for me) creates the vague sense that a museum doesn't have enough worth looking at.

It's sort of the MOCA-on-Grand phenomenon. Although that museum now provides free entry, its square footage and number of objects on view are so modest, more people likely have the feeling of "why bother?...let's go to the beach instead!"

Michael Govan has mulled over statistics that show more people each year make an effort to visit The Grove instead of LACMA.
Re "Today, at the Yale Art Gallery (Kahn building) important paintings hang on a masonry wall.":
I don't recall any art hanging on Kahn's concrete at Yale. But in any case, Kahn's concrete is more gold-hay colored, and uniformly so. Eye-pleasing.
The British Center, in contrast, has loads of naked, muddled-color concrete, like LACMA's. But it's not used as surface for the art.
Again, no issue with stone/rock recipes..it's the bad color backdrops that offend good art.
Someone expressed concern about whether the objects on the tabletops could fall over. I suggest one looks again carefully. I expect they are well battened down. To do so otherwise would be museo-malpractice. After all, you all are waiting for the Big One, am I right?
*
Contrast LA's measures with Japan's. They use clear fishing wire wrapped 5 ways from Sunday. Most unattractive. But, hey, they're THEIR national treasures, so when in Rome.
More so, unfortunate, because the Japanese have been ravenous collectors of Chinese ceramics since the Southern Song (12th c.). One can only truly learn Chinese ceramic history by traveling as well to Japan.
As an aside, having read 8 millenia of ceramic history, I'm convinced most great leaps forward in their ceramic tech history came as a result of accident.
Anonymous said…
There is gobs more space for art. Loads of floor area. Acres worth of wall space. LACMA curators last year complained that it was too much work to fill in the building by opening day, so I'm not surprised they had to scale it down. Hopefully they keep adding even after all the grand ceremonies have died down.

I really want LACMA to consider hanging paintings on a system like Lina Bo Bardi's glass easels. Her philosophy to using those easels jibe almost perfectly with Govan's vision and would be all of a piece with Zumthor's architecture. They should give it a go, it would be a total gas.
Anonymous said…

https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2026/04/lacma-francis-bacon-1024x768.jpeg

^ That's giving me the vibes of "we don't have enough to put on display, so the warehouse look will have to do: And, okay, the Bacon triptych is nice and all, but so much space around it has to be bare?

And they couldn't find something to go with the Ardabil carpet?

https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2026/04/17-ardabil-carpet-lacma-1024x768.jpeg

Walls like these would look better if they were tinted:

https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2026/04/16-model-lives-in-baroque-italy-1024x768.jpeg

And the way the wall and floor space is used here, you'd think that Govan and his curators were working with something like 1 million square feet----not even caring that such objects are more ideal for BCAM.

https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2026/04/23-dora-de-larios-lacma-2-1024x768.jpg

^ That's why seeing all the "not on view" designation on objects in LACMA's online collection yesterday really annoyed me.
Oooo, YES!
I had no idea what you meant. See Google Images!
Arrays of paintings as splendid as the field of columns inside the Mosque of Cordoba.
You've gone full monty, LACMA. What have you got to lose?
Anonymous said…
It''s the same raw aesthetic. At the Yale Art Gallery, it's most evident in the columns. No effort was made to smooth over the board forms.

The gold that you see may be an effect of the lighting/reflections off the wood floor. The concrete color is a neutral gray with a slight pink hue. You really need to look to see the pink hue.

I know the building very well. I used to sit and read in front of Night Cafe. Night Cafe used to hang on a pogo wall (next to the window wall). There was a sofa/sitting area directly in front of it. On most nights, I was the only one there. It felt like I owned the place.

--- J. Garcin
Anonymous said…
> LACMA curators last year
> complained that it was too
> much work to fill in the
> building by opening day,

It's easy for me sitting a million miles away to nitpick about something. I've worked on projects where I at first think I've done a good or thorough job, then I come back and go, "that's crap! You missed this or that!"

I've also sometimes thought one thing when dealing with an issue theoretically (or from afar), and then when I'm up-close-and-personal, my perspective changes.

As for W Poundstone's review today, I'm relieved about most of it, but his description of LACMA's Egyptian collection (vis-a-vie the one in NYC---and not even at the Met) did make me pause and lol. Or where I admit that LACMA's collections do sometimes require a Michael Govan to be a rube (Hi, J Garcin!).
Re "It's the same raw aesthetic. At the Yale Art Gallery, it's most evident in the columns. No effort was made to smooth over the board forms.":
Columns. Yes. Some of my best friends are columns. Kahn's not hanging Dugento panels on them either.

Re "The gold that you see may be an effect of the lighting/reflections off the wood floor. The concrete color is a neutral gray with a slight pink hue. You really need to look to see the pink hue.": Yes. Interesting. I have to look again.
PS- The circular staircase at the gallery entry is raw, raw, raw. Again, no pics a'hangin'. Just sayin'.

Re "On most nights, I was the only one there. It felt like I owned the place.":
It's nice to have made art pieces like close members of the family.
PS- Based on the featured photo, LACMA's handling of Hubert Robert's
"Stair and Fountain in the Park of a Roman Villacirca" is an ongoing art crime.
Re "It's the same raw aesthetic. At the Yale Art Gallery, it's most evident in the columns. No effort was made to smooth over the board forms.":
Columns. Yes. Some of my best friends are columns. Kahn's not hanging Dugento panels on them either.

Re "The gold that you see may be an effect of the lighting/reflections off the wood floor. The concrete color is a neutral gray with a slight pink hue. You really need to look to see the pink hue.": Yes. Interesting. I have to look again.
PS- The circular staircase at the gallery entry is raw, raw, raw. Again, no pics a'hangin'. Just sayin'.

Re "On most nights, I was the only one there. It felt like I owned the place.":
It's nice to have made art pieces like close members of the family.
PS- Based on the featured photo, LACMA's handling of Hubert Robert's
"Stair and Fountain in the Park of a Roman Villa" is an ongoing art crime.