David Geffen Galleries: First Look
| Modern art curator Stephanie Barron shows off Matisse's ceramic mural La Gerbe, 1953. Fun fact: the space is named for Mellody Hobson and George Lucas |
LACMA is holding media previews for its David Geffen Galleries. Some of my first takes on the museum's new permanent collection wing:
Zumthor's building. I'm OK with the concrete, I love Reiko Sudo's curtains, and the stairway isn't steep, it only looks that way.
In all Peter Zumthor has delivered on the promised experiential qualities. The Wilshire overpass melds city and museum, letting you hover just above the metropolis.
| European Renaissance and Medieval sculpture |
| Eucharistic Urn in the Form of a Pelican, Potosi, Bolivia, about 1760 |
| Dog, Colima, Mexico, 200 BCE–500 CE |
The outer ("terrace") spaces, near the windows, rock. Many ceramic and sculptural works are shown on handsome casework tables without glazing. The result is nothing short of spectacular. The winsome little dog of ancient Colima, a popular favorite, inhabits your own space under perfect light. It's not like seeing it in a museum, it's more like having it in a sunny corner of your home.
(I just hope they know what they're doing. I'm less concerned about theft than the inquisitive fingers of the next generation of art lovers. It's said the tables' dimensions have been engineered for safety.)
| Core gallery installation with Issey Miyake's Plastic Body, 1980–1981 (right) and Robert Mapplethorpe's 1982 photograph of Lisa Lyons wearing the Miyake. This is an example of a black-tinted wall |
The enclosed "core" galleries, with the tinted walls, are deeply weird, in a good way. It's a museum setting unlike any other you've experienced. Call it Zen-like or Goth or Zumthoresque.
| Courtyard gallery of African textiles and African-American quilts |
The in-between "courtyard" galleries are hit and miss. In the right slant of light, with brightly colored art, they work. More often, they're left in murky shadow. It's hard for your eyes to adjust with the terrace galleries' sunlight in your peripheral vision.
| Hubert Robert, Stair and Fountain the Park of a Roman Villa, about 1775 |
Glare is a problem for Elaine Wynn's great Bacon triptych and also for most of the works on paper and textiles outside the core galleries. The chrome curtains may help but don't eliminate the issue. There's even glare on some unglazed oil paintings, such as the big Hubert Robert park scene.
| Silhouettes of Hindu deities |
The flipside of glare is silhouetting, when you view works against the blaring L.A. light. In most cases you can position yourself to avoid glare and silhouetting, but that's a distraction.
Govan's installation philosophy. Michael Govan decreed thematic and ever-changing displays of the permanent collection. As I said in a 2024 post, a thematic strategy works well enough at the Museum of Modern Art. But I was skeptical of how well it could work with LACMA's wider-ranging but far spottier collection.
I'm delighted to report that the 78 themes on view here are smart, interesting, and fresh. Introductory text panels don't talk down to the audience, and they can quote Barthes without sounding like pretentious AI. In fact, the themes are more art-wonk than populist ("The Evolution of Abstract Painting in Modern Korea"; "Indigenismo in Latin America"; "In Conversation: James McNeil Whistler and Japan").
| Lauren Halsey, Sphinx, 2026 |
There are contemporary pieces in almost every installation, even among archaeological objects. Mostly it works, as the themes often treat the persistence of artistic concerns across time. The Lauren Halsey Sphinx adds scale to LACMA's second- and third-rate collection of Egyptian antiquities. Incidentally, there's another monumental Halsey relief and a Tavares Strachan bust, both new to the collection.
It was said that the Geffen would have 2500 to 3000 objects on view. That was dialed back to "over 2000," and at the media preview Govan called it "2000 and counting." (Talk about your incredible shrinking museum.) In any case, these are respectable numbers for a U.S. art museum that's not the Metropolitan.
| Perenchio gifts by Monet, Gauguin, Degas, and Caillebotte |
| Guarani artists, Franciscan missions, Cabinet and Writing Desk, 18th century |
Being shown for the first time is this 18th-century Paraguayan cabinet, a gift of the 2022 Collectors Committee.
Navigation. It's not easy to find your way around. I suggest ignoring the "oceans" and focusing on the city views for navigation.
| "Turmoil and Optimism in Latin America" assembles avant-garde art and design from the 1950s to 1970s |
| Within a few months, van Gogh's Tarascon Stagecoach has hopscotched from two exhibitions in the Resnick to the Geffen installation. To the right is Gauguin's The Red Cow |
| Jeff Koons, Split-Rocker, 2000 |
Here's a Geffen's-eye view of the Jeff Koons topiary.
This is the least engaging view out the Geffen windows. Let's hope the trees will give the neighbors some privacy.
| Alexander Calder, Three Quintains (Hello Girls), 1964 |
Here's the reinstalled Calder mobile, commissioned by the museum for its 1965 opening on Wilshire Boulevard.
Comments
I was looking for other museums with LACMA's concrete profile.
Google search Tadao Ando's Benesse Museum in Japan. Although, I don't see evidence that, there, they have used their walls' concrete as an actual backdrop for their art displays.
There's nothing wrong with LACMA's concrete wall construction, per se, except that they are using it to display an important art collection. If the only art on display were pedestaled sculptures in the round, I'd have less objections. As it is, it's as appealing as a salt mine.
The Potosi Eucharistic Urn in the Form of a Pelican is riveting.
On security: It's a red-letter day for the museum security guard industry.
I adore no vitrines, but I predict a lot of loud choruses: "NO TOUCHING, PLEASE!"
> on this until I'd have a chance
> to see the installation in full.
I was browsing LACMA's online list of European art and a lot of it was marked as "not on view." But that did include also the de la Tour and a Rembrandt, which I know are on display, so I'm not sure if the museum's technical crew has updated everything.
Seeing all the "not on view" really annoyed me because certain photos of the Geffen look like there's more blank wall space and open floor areas than what I'd consider ideal. In one image, Todd Gray's "Octavia's Gaze" is shown displayed not far from a large blank gray concrete wall.
So does Govan and his staff think gray plain concrete is a visual respite?
Although I didn't like the idea of space outside of BCAM and Resnick being set aside for contemporary art, I now just want the Geffen to not look like the museum has more square footage than artworks. I recall even sections of the Ahmanson Gallery made me feel that way.
It's the opposite effect of the gargantuan old-time museums of the world where everything but the kitchen sink seems to be on display.
The lower level of the Simon Museum has so much of its Indian-Southeastern-Asian art, mainly sculptures, to browse through, it can become visually fatiguing or overwhelming. In such locations, I'd almost welcome contemporary interspersed with older art or, of course (most people's favorite), Impressionist paintings, etc.
As for Zumthor's display units, I sure hope they won't tip over in an earthquake. To me, they look flimsy, and that goes triple if the objects sitting on them aren't latched down either. I'd be really surprised if objects with a rounded or bowl-like bottom are affixed to the tables.
But I can see the different paradigm of looking at items reminiscent of being in the comfort of one's living room compared with a museum that's so visually heavy, it's similar to being in a room where someone is wearing way too much perfume.
All I know is places similar to the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (much less a Met, National Gallery, Louvre), have been like getting hit with a blast of cold water, a wake-up call that LACMA since 1965 has been asleep at the wheel.
LACMA and the Geffen Galleries have weaknesses that are a variation of Pereira 1965 (eg, lack of space for staffers, conservation, storage), but the museum before 2020 was even more not ready for prime time.
Is the Kahn building a salt mine? Are Roman villas? ... If we start with the cave paintings, humans have been hanging art on stone/concrete longer than they have been hanging art on velvet or white walls.
--- J. Garcin
> a salt mine.
Lots of traditionalists (which I've been when the Beaux-Arts-enfilade format was preferred by me) and connoisseur-type visitors to museums will probably be non-plussed about the Geffen. But the person who gave a negative online review of LACMA compared with her Minneapolis Institute of Art might not be as dismissive of Goff-Piano-Zumthor as she was of Pereira-Hardy/Holzman/Pfeiffer.
This image makes me wince:
https://p-news-upload.storage.googleapis.com/2023/06/lacma3-e1686936818203.jpg
If LACMA's main buildings were created in the early 1900s in the Beaux-Arts tradition (with galleries to match), then their demolition would have been pathetic. The Ahmanson Gallery's atrium was also no match for the impressive old-time entry spaces that exist in lots of museums created in the early 1900s (or before) in both large and small cities throughout the US.
What's kind of jarring is the lack of floor-bolted metal barriers in front of precious artwork including the Van Gogh, and tables where objects usually behind glass cases are just sitting there. They look vulnerable, where I'm sure it was done to be more accessible. It'll take some time to get used to the privilege of being so close, just from never having seen them displayed like that.
The commissioned works by Pedro Reyes, Do Ho Suh, Jeff Koons, and Sara Rosalena are all great additions from what I see in the photos being posted. I love the placement of the Calder in relation to the building. It's an improvement from its previous location.
There's not much out there concerning the space underneath the building and what they've done with all this added public space. I see a palm tree here and there and the sculpture garden, but I really hope they did something more with it where people will want to walk around and leisure.
There's an Erewhon cafe for the instagram crowd who can selfie their smoothies in front of the street lamps. A smoothie costs $20. Did LACMA really need to make a visit more expensive with the ticket costs already being $30? Not even a gesture. Erewhon is famously ridiculed for their out-of-touch prices.
Tint. That'll do it.
> Wainwright’s in The
> Guardian).
The Guardian:
It’s a treat to sit and watch the world go by from this elevated perch, and Bruce Goff’s eccentric pavilion for Japanese art has never looked so wondrously life-giving next to all the grey concrete. [End quote]
It didn't occur to me how the old Pereira buildings didn't make a good foreground or background for the Bruce Goff structure. I just saw an image of it in the context of the Geffen, and, yep (and as with the Calder once sort of hidden below the old cafeteria), it now doesn't come off as misplaced as it once did.
> Where did I see El Anatsui's
> metal tapestry...?
When the museum had it on display last year, they switched the angle:
https://unframed.lacma.org/sites/default/files/attachments/scroll%202.jpg
As for all the gray concrete walls, I think there are too many of them. Although W. Poundstone thinks otherwise, I believe more of the outer walls should be tinted, not just the walls in the "houses."
However, I now have a sense that too much wall and floor space isn't used for displaying objects. Although the clutter of a traditional encyclopedia museum can be visually oppressive too, the opposite extreme (at least for me) creates the vague sense that a museum doesn't have enough worth looking at.
It's sort of the MOCA-on-Grand phenomenon. Although that museum now provides free entry, its square footage and number of objects on view are so modest, more people likely have the feeling of "why bother?...let's go to the beach instead!"
Michael Govan has mulled over statistics that show more people each year make an effort to visit The Grove instead of LACMA.
I don't recall any art hanging on Kahn's concrete at Yale. But in any case, Kahn's concrete is more gold-hay colored, and uniformly so. Eye-pleasing.
The British Center, in contrast, has loads of naked, muddled-color concrete, like LACMA's. But it's not used as surface for the art.
Again, no issue with stone/rock recipes..it's the bad color backdrops that offend good art.
*
Contrast LA's measures with Japan's. They use clear fishing wire wrapped 5 ways from Sunday. Most unattractive. But, hey, they're THEIR national treasures, so when in Rome.
More so, unfortunate, because the Japanese have been ravenous collectors of Chinese ceramics since the Southern Song (12th c.). One can only truly learn Chinese ceramic history by traveling as well to Japan.
As an aside, having read 8 millenia of ceramic history, I'm convinced most great leaps forward in their ceramic tech history came as a result of accident.
I really want LACMA to consider hanging paintings on a system like Lina Bo Bardi's glass easels. Her philosophy to using those easels jibe almost perfectly with Govan's vision and would be all of a piece with Zumthor's architecture. They should give it a go, it would be a total gas.
https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2026/04/lacma-francis-bacon-1024x768.jpeg
^ That's giving me the vibes of "we don't have enough to put on display, so the warehouse look will have to do: And, okay, the Bacon triptych is nice and all, but so much space around it has to be bare?
And they couldn't find something to go with the Ardabil carpet?
https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2026/04/17-ardabil-carpet-lacma-1024x768.jpeg
Walls like these would look better if they were tinted:
https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2026/04/16-model-lives-in-baroque-italy-1024x768.jpeg
And the way the wall and floor space is used here, you'd think that Govan and his curators were working with something like 1 million square feet----not even caring that such objects are more ideal for BCAM.
https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2026/04/23-dora-de-larios-lacma-2-1024x768.jpg
^ That's why seeing all the "not on view" designation on objects in LACMA's online collection yesterday really annoyed me.
I had no idea what you meant. See Google Images!
Arrays of paintings as splendid as the field of columns inside the Mosque of Cordoba.
You've gone full monty, LACMA. What have you got to lose?
The gold that you see may be an effect of the lighting/reflections off the wood floor. The concrete color is a neutral gray with a slight pink hue. You really need to look to see the pink hue.
I know the building very well. I used to sit and read in front of Night Cafe. Night Cafe used to hang on a pogo wall (next to the window wall). There was a sofa/sitting area directly in front of it. On most nights, I was the only one there. It felt like I owned the place.
--- J. Garcin
> complained that it was too
> much work to fill in the
> building by opening day,
It's easy for me sitting a million miles away to nitpick about something. I've worked on projects where I at first think I've done a good or thorough job, then I come back and go, "that's crap! You missed this or that!"
I've also sometimes thought one thing when dealing with an issue theoretically (or from afar), and then when I'm up-close-and-personal, my perspective changes.
As for W Poundstone's review today, I'm relieved about most of it, but his description of LACMA's Egyptian collection (vis-a-vie the one in NYC---and not even at the Met) did make me pause and lol. Or where I admit that LACMA's collections do sometimes require a Michael Govan to be a rube (Hi, J Garcin!).
Columns. Yes. Some of my best friends are columns. Kahn's not hanging Dugento panels on them either.
Re "The gold that you see may be an effect of the lighting/reflections off the wood floor. The concrete color is a neutral gray with a slight pink hue. You really need to look to see the pink hue.": Yes. Interesting. I have to look again.
PS- The circular staircase at the gallery entry is raw, raw, raw. Again, no pics a'hangin'. Just sayin'.
Re "On most nights, I was the only one there. It felt like I owned the place.":
It's nice to have made art pieces like close members of the family.
PS- Based on the featured photo, LACMA's handling of Hubert Robert's
"Stair and Fountain in the Park of a Roman Villacirca" is an ongoing art crime.
Columns. Yes. Some of my best friends are columns. Kahn's not hanging Dugento panels on them either.
Re "The gold that you see may be an effect of the lighting/reflections off the wood floor. The concrete color is a neutral gray with a slight pink hue. You really need to look to see the pink hue.": Yes. Interesting. I have to look again.
PS- The circular staircase at the gallery entry is raw, raw, raw. Again, no pics a'hangin'. Just sayin'.
Re "On most nights, I was the only one there. It felt like I owned the place.":
It's nice to have made art pieces like close members of the family.
PS- Based on the featured photo, LACMA's handling of Hubert Robert's
"Stair and Fountain in the Park of a Roman Villa" is an ongoing art crime.