Laura Aguilar at the Huntington

Laura Aguilar, In Sandy's Room, 1989 (negative) and 1990 (print).  The Huntington, purchased with funds from the Estate of Nancy and George Parsons. (c) Laura Aguilar Trust of 2016
Laura Aguilar (1959–2018) got only modest museum attention during her short, subversive career. Since her death, Aguilar has become popular with curators on both coasts. The Huntington and the Getty have each added substantial holdings of Aguilar's work. The Huntington is debuting its collection in a one-room exhibition, "Laura Aguilar: Body and Landscape," in the Virginia Steele Scott Galleries for American Art. 
Installation view, "Laura Aguilar: Body and Landscape"
Aguilar was big, Chicana, and queer. Her B&W self-portrait In Sandy's Room is big, nearly 50 inches wide. Aguilar was house-sitting at a friend's home in Pasadena, perusing a selection of vintage glamour magazines. Aguilar portrays herself nude and abundant, with a fan and a Diet Coke—a riposte to the Condé Nast vision of svelte, ice-queen beauty. In Sandy's Room recalls Diana Arbus' nudist colony pictures, but with the difference that the "other" is the artist and perhaps, the viewer. 

After In Sandy's Room, nudity—nudes of sizes, shapes, and colors rarely seen in art—became part of the Aguilar brand. The Huntington selection feature nudes in the U.S. Western landscape, a subject dating at least back to Anne Brigman. Another inevitable comparison is Edward Weston. Aguilar's work builds on Weston's abstracted back studies with invisible head and limbs. Weston made conventionally beautiful bodies into something monstrous. Aguilar finds austere beauty in bodies and perspectives outside the media mainstream. The show includes a 1929 Weston Pepper that rhymes with some of Aguilar's visual explorations of her own body. 

Edward Weston, Pepper, 1928. The Huntington, gift of Edward Weston and the Guggenheim Foundation
Laura Aguilar, Grounded #103, 2006-2007 (negative) and 2018 (print). The Huntington, gift of the Laura Aguilar Trust of 2016
Laura Aguilar, Untitled from Grounded series, 2006-2007 (negative) and 2018 (print). The Huntington, gift of the Laura Aguilar Trust of 2016
The "Grounded" series, shot in Joshua Tree National Park in 2006–2007, trades in visual puns that veer into the metaphysical. In an untitled color print, the artist moons the camera, mimicking a geologic butt crack. In #106, Aguilar's body merges with the landscape, like some kind of evolutionary camouflage. 
Laura Aguilar, Grounded #106, 2006-2007 (negative) and 2018 (print). The Huntington, gift of the Laura Aguilar Trust of 2016 
"Laura Aguilar: Body and Landscape" runs through Sep. 7. 2026. It will be followed by a new selection of prints, "Laura Aguilar: Day of the Dead" (Sep. 20, 2026–Mar. 1, 2027). 
Installation view, "Mercedes Dorame—Deliquescence: Sites of Transformation"
Also newly on view in the Virginia Steele Scott Galleries is "Mercedes Dorame—Deliquescence: Sites of Transformation," starting a three-year residency in the glass-enclosed Loggia (through Mar. 2029). An adjacent gallery displays "Sandy Rodriguez: Book 13" (through April 26, 2027). 
"Deliquescence: Sites of Transformation"
Installation view, "Sandy Rodriguez: Book 13"
 

Comments

Wow. There's so much to this report. I'm pondering.
Anonymous said…
> Aguilar portrays herself
> nude and abundant,
> with a fan and a Diet
> Coke

People who think "Diet" cola is somehow better ("less fattening!") than plain Coke are similar to folks who think booze is better than dope, or visa versa.

How the subject of health, obesity and the medical community got caught up in today's political discourse makes me think of LACMA's director claiming that plain (not tinted) concrete walls make a better backdrop for artworks than painted drywall does.
Anonymous said…
For once it would nice to not mention LACMA in every single post.
Artist said…
Here are a few more things: She bagan photographing in the 1980's. She was self-taught, taking some classes at East LA Community College. She was included in exhibitions at the Venice Biennial in 93, and a retrospective in 2017 at Vincent Price Museum. She died of diabetes at age 58 in 2018.
Her self-portraits reminded me of another queer LA photographer: Catherine Opie. Curious to know if they knew eachother since the time lines are almost identical. Opie moved to LA in 1988.
Anonymous said…
> She died of diabetes
> at age 58 in 2018.

Gee, I wonder why.

btw, the exhibit of the works of an artist who loved obesity and queerness admittedly doesn't interest me as much as a post about, for example, the interior of the Lucas Museum.

A post about the photos of a nude, obese, so-called queer now on display at the Huntington doesn't quite grab me compared with a post about that same museum, LACMA or the Getty acquiring a, say, Titian or Rembrandt, etc.

Which makes me wonder if the Ahmanson Foundation continues to shun LACMA in favor of the Huntington. I hope not. But if they do, that won't be a sign of confidence in what the Geffen Galleries are all about.,
Opie and Aguilar crossed paths, as they were in a group show at LACE in 1990. After Aguilar's death, Opie was quoted as admiring her work.
https://welcometolace.org/lace/all-but-the-obvious/
https://www.good.is/laura-aguilar-photographer/
You're a malign gratuity.
Anonymous said…
Opie's work is quite different. Compare Aguilar's "crack" photograph to Opie's photos of Diana Nyad. There, Opie is recording how nature/the quest has imprinted itself on Nyad's body. In Aguilar, the relationship of the body to nature is purely formal (associative) --- crack in nature and crack in butt.

Or compare Aguliar's In Sandy's Room to Opie's portrait of the high school football player Seth. Both are portraits of "hot" bodies, hot as in temperature. In Opie, heat takes the form of red skin and a wet shirt. In Aguilar, heat again takes the form of an association --- nudity, a refreshing drink, and a fan.

In Opie, Seth has an osmotic relationship to nature --- he's sweating and the background is misty. In Aguilar, the female body has an oppositional relationship to nature. Nature fits neatly into a square (the window). The curves of her body do not.

Aguilar's treatment of the body still reminds me of the treatment of bodies in surrealism --- bodies as signs (as association). Whereas in Opie bodies are situated more at the border between sensation (heat) and sense (community).

--- J. Garcin