 |
| Installation view, "The A. Jerrold Perenchio Collection of Impressionist and Modern Art" |
In 2014 TV executive A. Jerrold Perenchio (1930–2017) promised the core of his collection of Impressionist and Modern art to LACMA. At the time the coverage focused on the financial value of the gift, estimated at half a billion dollars and said to the be museum's largest ever. LACMA followed up the next year with an installation of six Perenchio works on the occasion of its 50th anniversary. Among them was Degas' At the Café-Concert: Song of the Dog, a prized gouache/pastel/monotype.
LACMA published a catalog of the full Perenchio collection in 2016. But the works remained unseen by the public until the Geffen's opening. One deep-red room is showing nearly all the Perenchio paintings and sculptures and a few drawings.
In his varied career "Jerry" Perenchio managed recording artists and promoted prize fights (Muhammad Ali v. George Frasier, 1971). He co-produced a string of sitcoms with Norman Lear, starting with All in the Family. Perenchio lived in a sitcom mansion himself, the one used for exterior shots in The Beverly Hillbillies. His film productions included the sci-fi classic Blade Runner (1982). Perenchio's most lucrative venture, however, seems to have been the Spanish-language network Univision.
The Perenchio gift is LACMA's most important in the Impressionist-Modern field since the Janice and Henri Lazarof gift announced in 2007. The Lazarof collection is larger (130 objects v. 48 for Perenchio) with more artists, major and secondary. But the Perenchio gift has a higher proportion of star pictures. That includes the aforementioned At the Café-Concert; three Monets spanning a Water Lilies, a landscape, and a flower piece; and Gauguin's Otahi.
Like many of his generation, Perenchio favored the boldface names of the School of Paris. This resulted in a few dull choices—
a small Renoir and
a very late (1974) Chagall. But unlike many Hollywood collectors, Perenchio had the funds and ambition to spend when major works came on the market. He acquired a Cézanne; three Pissarros; two Bonnards; two Légers; two Magrittes; drawings by Picasso and Matisse; small sculptures by Carpeaux, Degas, Maillol, Max Ernst (a chess set) and Jasper Johns (a light bulb). The collection brings multiple "firsts" to LACMA, among them the first paintings by Caillebotte and Kees van Dongen; the first Fantin-Latour still life.
 |
| Degas, At the Café-Concert: The Song of the Dog, about 1876–1877 |
At the Café-Concert was formerly in the collection of Louisine Havemeyer, most of which was donated to the Met. The Havemeyer family sold
Café-Concert and
Waiting, a pastel, in the early 1980s. The Getty and Norton Simon Museum pooled resources to bid successfully on
Waiting. That cleared the field for Perenchio to win
At the Café Concert. The performer is Emma ("Theresa") Valadon, who did a bawdy novelty song imitating a dog.
 |
| Degas, Study in the Nude for Dressed Dancer, 1879–1917 (model) and 1919-1937 or later (cast) |
 |
| Degas, Dancer Resting (pastel), about 1879 |
 |
| Monet, Water Lilies, about 1908 |
 |
| Monet, The Artist's Garden, Vétheuil, 1881 |
The Artist's Garden, Vétheuil, is one of four versions Monet painted at his summer home in a Parisian suburb. An identically sized (just over 39 by 32 in.) version is at the Norton Simon Museum; a larger picture is at the National Gallery of Art; still another is in a private collection. The Perenchio painting is distinguished by a cloudless sky and two children on the steps.
 |
| Monet, Asters, 1880 |
Monet seems to have regarded his still lifes as a side hustle to make quick cash. But his bouquets of sunflowers prompted van Gogh to take up the subject.
 |
| Henri Fantin-Latour, Dahlias, 1890 |
Fantin-Latour's
Dahlias underpromises and overdelivers, as the bouquet includes roses, hollyhocks, nasturtiums, and gladiolus. Ruth Edwards, the French artist's dealer in England, used the title
These are the Flowers of Middle Summer.
 |
| Gauguin, Otahi, 1893 |
Gauguin's
Otahi was formerly in the collection of Russian industrialist Dmitri Rybolovlev, who paid an astonishing $120 million for it. Not part of Perenchio's 2014 promised gift, it was added to the LACMA bequest.
Otahi means "alone," and Gauguin seems to have been inspired by Degas' pictures of solitary bathers. Charles Stuckey wrote that
Otahi and related works "attempt to answer the challenge that obsessed early French realists including Degas, for whom the careful observation of the back of a figure… could be potentially as revelatory of personality, status, and social history as conventional frontal pose."
 |
| Gustave Caillebotte, A Soldier, about 1879 |
Caillebotte also painted solitary (male) figures from the back, but
A Soldier draws on Manet's
Fifer and its flattened background.
 |
| Fernand Léger's Study for Reading and Woman with a Bouquet, both 1924 |
These two paintings are prime examples of the pneumatic style Léger adopted in the 1920s. LACMA's other paintings by the artist are earlier, more Cubist-derived.
Perenchio must have liked paintings of mirror reflections (read on).
 |
| Paintings by Kees van Donegan: Before the Mirror, about 1911, and Dolly, the Painter's Daughter, about 1912 |
Louis Vauxcelles, the French critic who coined the term fauve, considered Kees van Dongen to be the wildest of that wild bunch. The picture plane of Van Dongen's Before the Mirror is to be understood as the slinky woman's mirror (prefiguring Luis Camnitzer, in a way). The background is a Fauve cube with a saturated red wall and charcoal gray floor (not too unlike the room you're standing in).
 |
| René Magritte, Dangerous Liaisons, 1935 |
Magritte's
Dangerous Liaisons is likewise a picture of a woman melding with her mirror image. Draw your own connections to social media and AI agents. The picture's gold-toned frame puns on the painted mirror's frame. Maybe the joke is on all of us, barreling towards a
Black Mirror future as surreal as any painting.
 |
| Magritte, Stimulation Objective No. 3, 1939 |
Comments
Is the Baroque tint oxblood, and the Perenchio tint rust?
The Perenchio room color is not satisfying.
That also showed modern art.
Direct me to that blog. So I can complain endlessly about that.
--- J. Garcin
> The Geffen installation
> doesn't quite include
> everything in the
> Perenchio gift.
That's why Govan and his staffers should have clearly identified the building's grand opening as an exhibit-in-process. But their being unconcerned about that must be due to not minding the museum giving off the impression it has more space than objects to fill it with.
The overstuffed look and format of just about all the major-league museums of the world may be the opposite extreme. But that's better than the look of "we have only one Van Gogh" or "we're Hauser & Wirth hipsters."
However, LACMA has always shown certain creative-technical-aesthetic blind spots. A lack of a big enough budget since 1965 doesn't help, but I also wonder if people at the top even care---ie, J. Garcin's sometimes cited "rubes." lol
For instance, if the donors from 1965-1986 are no longer credited in the design of the current campus (eg, plaque), that's a big goof.
Some of the marble friezes on the walls of the Geffen are also held up by a black metal bar, which clashes with the artwork. Another "WTH?!"
But Govan and his staffers shrugging off matters like that or the public seeing so many *blank* concrete walls (much less the parking-lot-gray look of all of them) must be due to their being rubes. Latte-sipping rubes perhaps, but rubes nonetheless. Oh, well, that's LACMA for you.
However, Zumthor 2026 is better than Pereira 1965. But, okay, even the Museum of Fine Arts Houston 2026 is better than LACMA 1965.
Vuillard's Sacha Guitry in his Dressing Room is astounding. His favorite of mine is at the Kunsthaus, Zurich.
I wish I knew more about Léger.
^ Painting depicted in that architect's rendering of the Geffen, as far as I know, isn't currently exhibited in the building. I don't recall the name of the artist, but the work was bequeathed by the Ahmanson Foundation.
The foundation should have long complained that the Pereira-era buildings (one of them named for their founder) were some of the worse of any museum's in the nation. But the AF was correct in griping that works they've funded through the years wouldn't be on display in the new space.
Even though more of the collection is supposed to be installed in the next several months, I don't trust LACMA's director and staff to do things in a professional way. Such as not minding the museum coming off like a second-rate operation. Sorry for the cynicism, but that's the over 60-year-long history of the place.