 |
| Paul Grimm, Approaching Storm, about 1925. James Irvine Swinden Family Collection |
The Depression years were grim times for Southern California's colony of visual artists. Some found work in the motion picture studios, designing sets and costumes. Many of the artists recruited were plein air landscape painters—"California Impressionists." Though some had achieved national reputations in the 1920s, their naturalism was considered derivative and outdated. That however was no problem at the studios, which needed painted backdrops indistinguishable from life. It was thus California artists who established the look and feel of setbound Hollywood pictures of mid-century (The Wizard of Oz to The Sound of Music). In this way little-heralded West Coast artists may have had broader influence than the East Coast version of "American Impressionism." This under-recognized story is the subject of an exhibition at UC Irvine's Langson Orange County Museum, "Staging California in Early Hollywood." It has not a little relevance today, with productions fleeing California for cheaper locations and artists juggling side projects with paying the bills.
 |
| Installation view |
 |
| Paramount Pictures location map (facsimile), about 1927. Margaret Herrick Library, AMPAS |
This is a story of economics as much as art. California was originally a cost-cutting move. West Coast productions could evade Edison's rent-seeking and take advantage of Southern California's varied terrains and climate. Shown in facsimile is a Paramount Studio map celebrating California as global simulacrum. The Salton Sea could deepfake the Red Sea, and the Palos Verdes peninsula was a dead ringer for Wales.
The Depression hit the Hollywood studios too. Moguls prioritized techniques for shooting on location without going on location. As Sam Goldwyn had it, "A rock's a rock, and a tree's a tree. Shoot it in Griffith Park." Another popular location was Chatsworth's Garden of the Gods, often a stand in for the Old West or the Ancient Middle East. The 1928 silent film of Noah's Ark combined real scenery with a matte painting of the ark by artist Paul Grimm. At the time, matte paintings were grisaille, but Grimm's gift for capturing the high-key cloudscapes of California's rainy season was useful. The introduction of Technicolor amplified demand for color landscapists.
 |
Emil J. Kosa, Jr., Portrait of Edith Head, 1950. The Hilbert Collection
|
A key figure is Emil J. Kosa Jr. He was a nepo baby of sorts, for his father also worked for the studios. But Junior built an independent career as an American Scene painter, getting shows at the Los Angeles County Museum in 1926 and 1940. In 1933 he took a job at 20th Century Fox, where he worked for decades, winning a 1963 Oscar for Cleopatra. Kosa was an occasional portraitist of Hollywood folk and the designer of the 20th Century Fox searchlights logo. Late in his career, he turned to abstraction, but it was perhaps too little, too late. It was Kosa's searchlights logo that captured the imagination of Ed Ruscha, Monty Python, and others.
 |
| Granville Redmond, Untitled—Moonlight Marsh Scene, before 1935. Gift of the Irvine Museum |
Granville Redmond's paintings of hillsides and poppies were popular with the Hollywood crowd. Charlie Chaplin bought his paintings, promoted his art, and even cast Redmond (who was deaf) as actor in several of his films. The two works on view—one a weird nocturne of a swamp—makes you wonder why Redmond isn't better known.
 |
| Warren Newcombe, Winter Ploughing California, Calabasas, 1931. Gift of the Irvine Museum |
During his tenure at MGM, Warren Newcombe invented the "Newcombe shot," involving a matte painting on glass. It was Newcombe and his MGM minions who painted the looming Emerald City and cliffs in
The Wizard of Oz. Secretive about his methods, Newcombe was considered a wizard himself. In comparison his easel paintings seem unexceptional.
 |
| Bill Anderson, Gordon Butcher, John Gary Coakley, John Harold Coakley, Emil J. Kosa, Jr., and Arthur Grover Rider, backdrop for The Sound of Music, 1965. Courtesy JC Backings Corporation and the Coakley Family |
"Staging California" includes one matte painting, a view of the Alps created for
The Sound of Music. This was late in the tradition, as matte paintings were being supplanted by location filming. The backdrop was a collaborative effort of Kosa and five other artists. The windows in the Alpine town were made of translucent material to allow them to be lighted from behind for night views.
 |
| Detail of Sound of Music backdrop |
 |
| Edward Biberman, Pavement Patterns (Pickets), 1945. The Buck collection, UCI Langston Orange County Museum of Art |
It's become a journalistic cliché to link the 2023 Writer's Guild and SAG-AFTRA strikes to the recent decline in Los Angeles production. Contentious strikes are nothing new. The show includes an Edward Biberman painting of the 1945 strike that led to Hollywood's "Bloody Friday," a two-hour melee outside Warner Brothers' Burbank studios. Biberman, brother of a blacklisted screenwriter, often favored eccentric compositions. In this case he seems to be taking a cue from van Gogh's (Gustave Doré's) prison yard.
"Staging California in Early Hollywood" runs through Oct. 4, 2026.
Comments
Can there really be that many convincing locales in one American state? If yes, that's quite impressive.
> as much as art.
And history too---in certain ways, LA is barely 90-100 years old.
Someone told me a few years ago that, after her trip to Europe, the museums in London are better than the ones in LA.
Speaking of which, the UK and its capital are where some of the biggest, most popular filmed entertainment in the 2020s is now produced.
As for the comment about museums, that was expressed out of left field. I had never previously mentioned the subject of them (or how they're judged), so the opinion was impromptu.
Another person more recently, when talking about 5905 Wilshire Blvd having a shaky track record, said something like, "that's LACMA for 'ya."
The Geffen, the AMPAS museum and the museum being built by a famous filmmaker all coincide with one of LA''s more visible, historic businesses going down the tubes. As for Dataland, the reality of AI or CGI isn't even being factored into that equation either.
I assure you that the statement is true. Please move on.
... Van Gogh takes Dore's circle and makes it his own, eliciting in his painting after Dore the dark side of the circle, the circle as a symbol of confinement. By contrast, in Starry NIght, Van Gogh explored the light side of the circle, as a symbol of cosmic energy.
--- J. Garcin
> statement is true.
I didn't say it wasn't. And I mentioned it in the context of this blog entry noting how the entertainment industry in LA is taking a header.
In turn, some of the most successful, popular movies in today's age are now being produced in London or Britain, not in LA or even the US.
In 2026, this all connects to the Geffen's installation being way too easily second guessed, which has been a problem with LACMA in general since (wait for it!) 1965.
Sheesh, Ted, is that the extent of your commenting style? Posting in even Instagram, Facebook, X/Twitter or Youtube can be more involved and thorough than that.
Some media-social platforms generate hundreds or thousands of replies under just one topic. In cases like those, I wonder, why do people even bother?
As for London, it has been a cultural-creative and economic-financial powerhouse for generations.
In the visual arts, Paris in the 1800s and early 1900s was the hub, then it gradually moved across the Atlantic to NYC.
Creative and economic vibrancy tend to go together. This blog entry about an exhibit in Orange County mentions the decline of the entertainment industry in LA. The region's economy in general is flat-lining. Will that affect its cultural-cultural life?
LACMA got support from people or entities that no longer exist. People like David Geffen or George Lucas made big money from things that also no longer exist or are a shell of their former self.
But in other ways, Richard Brown and William Pereira in the 1950s-1960s were working off a more modest template. So their shortcomings ("rube") were less surprising. But in the case of Michael Govan and Peter Zumthor?
A "patchy" collection may be more obvious when an installation is the way it is in Govan's and his staffers' Geffen Galleries. In comparison, the packaging, if you will, of institutions like the Museum of Fine Arts Houston is so professional, it helps offset the flimsy or cheap-o format used by LACMA.
Aaron Betsky, architectmagazine. com
[The Geffen Galleries] is a collection of Tik Tok Houses nested into a McMansion. In wandering around this cave I somehow kept thinking of the ruin Ye left behind when [Govan] tried to renovate the Tadao Ando-designed beach house in Malibu.
Some of my friends and many commentators talk about the amazing views from the second floor’s perimeter, but all I saw was the hodgepodge of buildings on and around Wilshire Boulevard and the cleaned-up landscaping of that thoroughfare itself… Only all the way at the rear, where the building abuts a dingbat apartment building, do you arrive at some found art in the form of views into people’s terraces.
As for the spaces the museum forms around and under its Geffen Wing, I am at a loss to find any virtues. A friend told me some of the barren expanses under the roof serve very well as party and thus fundraising spaces. For the rest you get acres of concrete and other beige material interspersed with a few tongues of vegetation and some plop-art outdoor sculptures.
The real issue, however, is that it turns out that LACMA does not have the holdings to support its pretentions of being a global art museum. Its collection is patchy at best, with a few gorgeous and significant pieces floating a great deal of mediocrity, and that problem is worse especially in antiquities and arts from non-Western countries.
In a sense that problem validates Govan’s justification of the fact that the Geffen contains considerably fewer square feet than the buildings he tore down to make room for it by saying that they didn’t need more space, just better ones.
But then why showcase your defects in so many acres of emptiness? The empty galleries can fill with more activities, as they were when, during the opening days, the Museum juiced up the areas between the art works with performances of all sorts.
Future directors can come up with smarter ways to hang and place the work and might even replace those hideous fixtures.
For the moment, DC is a more civilized trek.
I could go every day. It's my favorite.
I hope they show it at the Philadelphia venue.
If you see any show this year see Duchamp at Philadelphia.
... Following in Duchamp's footsteps, the artist Alex Da Corte used the same color for another window frame, that of "Good Break" from his Broken Window series. The color recurs throughout his work.
More recently, the artist Mathew Cerletty recreated the paint swatches as pieces of colored construction paper (Plane Dealer 2022). In Cerletty's work, found objects (e.g., envelopes, folders, eggs, etc.) become "retinal" again.
--- J. Garcin