Getty Moves Past Meier

WHY Architecture, rendering of planned Welcome Hall Lobby

The Getty has released renderings of its new tram, tram station, and entrance hall. The new architectural elements are being designed by Gehry Partners and WHY Architecture. Barely mentioned in the press release is the Getty Center's original architect, Richard Meier. In 2018 sexual harassment and assault charges by multiple women against Meier led to the Getty cutting ties with the architect. Meier resigned from his own firm and has not done any high-profile commissions since.

Unclear from the released images is what happens to Meier's soaring, cathedral-like Entrance Hall. WHY is designing a new lobby and bookstore, as well a cafe for the entrance pavilion. WHY's renderings don't show much or any of Meier's design. 

The press release says that the new elements will be "integrated seamlessly and respectfully" into Meier's design.

Existing entrance hall by Richard Meier & Partners
WHY Architecture, rendering of Welcome Hall Lobby
WHY Architecture, rendering of Store in Welcome Hall

Gehry Partners, rendering of planned Lower Tram Station Canopy

Comments

Anonymous said…
The first new staircase, the so-called “Spanish Steps,” looks great, but almost everyone arrives via the underground parking structure and will never see it. The second one, near the tram arrival, is another story. Like Trump’s obscene ballroom, it is a purely decorative staircase, meant to be looked at rather than used. You can only walk on either side in a cramped little space, with 80% of it off limits. If it does not get redesigned, it is going to look terrible compared to the better one down the hill.
Anonymous said…
Outdoor modern sculptures all second rate except Martin Puryear. Getty can do better - but they are not going to.
Anonymous said…
> sexual harassment and
> assault charges by
> multiple women against
> Meier

The corrupt behavior (or unprofessional thinking) of various people throughout society is way too common. And, based on history, almost the rule, not the exception. Such as what one of the former directors of the Getty Museum was caught doing---involving money, if not harassment, etc. In spite of that, such types still manage to snake their way back into the world of arts and culture, etc (eg, the Broad Museum's board).

Meier could be asked, "what the hell were you doing and thinking?!" Similarly, the museum several miles to the east does things that, although at least not at the level of fraud or criminality, also makes one wonder.

The supposed (or hoped-for) professionals at LACMA apparently didn't flinch when a display like this was installed.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQrfjMGrCpTMT60j9uRhRN41PZyyKI2nQvW5g&s

That's another version of, "what the hell were you doing and thinking?!"

Cue J. Garcin's "rube."

Or: sooie, sooie.

And when the Getty is willing to spend millions on their campus, they better not suddenly become tightwads when it comes to the contents (ie, acquisitions) in their museum.

The counterexample of LACMA always giving the sense it never has enough dollars is one reason for Wendy Beckett on PBS in the late 1990s describing it as "relatively under-appreciated." The Geffen not changing that as much as hoped is deja vu (1965) all over again.
Yep. 1965. Skipped! This is fun.
Anonymous said…
For such a huge campus, why is so little of it dedicated to galleries?
Anonymous said…
Don't know if I mentioned that LACMA since 1965 has always given the impression of being really, really professional. Over 60 years later, in 2026, objects like this in the Geffen Galleries are so well displayed, it's hard to second guess just how skilled LACMA's director and staff truly are.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ6F1Gnw35wumCsoEQbqbjsc5mecBShsPQMUg&s

^ The wall above that fireplace is lots of gray concrete. Blank gray concrete. So LACMA does a good job in making visitors think, whoa, the Louvre, Met & National Gallery, etc, sure are two-bit next to this!

By the way, where's the parking attendant?

Incidentally, that fireplace was originally in a home in Chicago. So it's a good thing the Chicago Institute of Art doesn't have it. That museum is lousy when it comes to evoking the setting of a warehouse or parking garage.