Getty Seeks Bust of Antoninus Pius

Portrait Bust of Emperor Antoninus Pius, about 140 AD. Auctioned as Property from the Berkeley Collection at Spetchley Park. Photo: Sotheby's

The Getty Museum is prepared to buy a portrait of Roman Emperor Antoninus Pius, contingent on a British export license. Sotheby's auctioned the bust last December for £7.72 million ($9.36 million).

Newlyweds Robert Martin Berkeley and Lady Mary Catherine Berkeley bought the emperor's likeness on their Naples honeymoon in 1851. Antoninus Pius was the fourth of the "five good emperors" of the second century AD. His beard presented him as a philosopher who happened to have a side hustle as an autocrat. 

The Berkeleys' souvenir is now understood to be one of the most accomplished of over a hundred surviving portraits. Larger than life, the 38-in.-high sculpture was carved from a single block of marble, perhaps including the socle as well. Nose, chin, and one eyebrow are restorations. The portrait has been kept at Spetchley Park, Worcestershire, and has never been on public view.

The Antonine period, named for this emperor's dynasty, is the apex of Roman naturalism. Three years ago, the Getty bought another well-preserved Antonine bust. It's a portrait of an unidentified man that the Denver Art Museum sold in order to focus on Western Hemisphere art. The Getty also has a full-figure statue of Antoninus' wife, Faustina the Elder.

The press release sounds reasonably optimistic about securing an export license. The British Museum owns another example of this portrait type

Side view

Comments

Exquisite.
Re "Larger than life, the 38-in.-high sculpture was carved from a single block of marble, perhaps including the socle as well.": Shouldn't an x-ray resolve that question nicely?
Anonymous said…
A handsome portrayal of him especially compared to the one Getty has now, where he’s got a weak chin and experiencing a receding hairline.
The Sotheby's write-up speaks of "the entire bust and its socle carved in one piece." Then a few sentences later, it walks that back: "Convex base of circular socle was possibly made separately (as grout along groove would suggest), in which case whether it is ancient or not remains unclear."

This sounds like they hadn't done an x-ray at the time of the auction.
Great thanks.
On the topic of marbles, NY is ecstatic right now over a new gift to the Met: an oil on marble by Francesco Salviati (1510–1563).
This, on top of the gift last year of a transformative Poussin on copper. And also the Met's purchase of Johann Liss's masterpiece, in 2020. The European Paintings Department is really cooking with gas now!
The Salviati work, a portrait of Bindo Altoviti (1491–1557), scion of the powerful Florentine banking family, was previously loaned to The Met for the 2021 exhibition The Medici: Portraits and Politics, 1512–1570.
Salviati stole that show from his peers, including Bronzino, to my mind.
The painting is a gift of the Assadour O. Tavitian Trust.
[The same trust just gifted to The Frick an oil on canvas, a Portrait of a Woman, by Giovanni Battista Moroni. It’s an absolute stunner.]

https://www.metmuseum.org/press/news/2023/salviati-acquisition
Anonymous said…
^ A painting on marble? Interesting. I know works like the Last Supper are on stone surfaces too (actually on a layer of plaster, not directly on rock), but they're built-in architectural elements - such as hieroglyphics in an ancient tomb - not movable objects displayed on a wall. But, hey, I've heard of paintings on velvet. lol.

I wonder how the technical sophistication of various renowned sculptors of, say, the past 50 years could have been ramped up to match the skill set of artisans of earlier generations? I also wonder how often a carver of marble (then or now) might chisel away too much and go, "D'oh! Oh crap!"

Then I think of how the ancient Egyptians managed to build the Sphinx or pyramids: No cranes, bulldozers or backhoes required. Some humans possess amazing skill in their little pinkie.
Anonymous said…
Sotheby’s estimate was 600,000-900,000 GBP. How is it that the Getty is paying $8M for it?
Short answer: An underbidder was willing to pay just short of that. It's not too unusual for works to sell for multiples of the high estimate. Sometimes estimates are set strategically low to encourage buyer interest. In any case, all it takes is two determined bidders to bid a price up.
Anonymous said…
I guess that high price is the reason Getty is so confident the UK won’t issue an export ban.
Anonymous said…
Off topic, but William, is there a reason certain blog posts have been deleted from this website? Such as the story about the Bernini bust acquisition from Getty and LACMA in 2015?
For several years the blog was hosted by the now-defunct ArtInfo. When it went down (without informing the bloggers!) much of the material vanished into the ether.