Dutch, Flemish, and French Galleries at LACMA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d938f/d938f19bbccc15efa760469934215cfda6ce0bce" alt=""
The kneejerk reaction is, doesn't that set a bad precedent? LACMA has a history of donors bolting after not getting their own museum-within-a-museum — or getting it, for that matter. There's been no indication that the Carters, by all accounts the museum's most unselfish supporters, demanded a room (or two) of their own — or else.
Remarkably, the Carter-segregated arrangement is as fine as you could ask for. The Carters bought only landscapes, seascapes, city views, church interiors, and still lifes. Everything they bought was a first-rate museum painting. Within these categories, LACMA has almost nothing worthy of hanging next to the Carters' works. The only painting in the "non-Carter" room that feels like it might belong is the Jan Davidsz de Heem Still Life with Oysters and Grapes, an Ahmanson gift. LACMA just sold several mediocre Dutch landscapes at Sotheby's. They wouldn't have scanned alongside the Carters'. This suggests a model for future collectors: If you really want your paintings to hang together in perpetuity, focus on one tightly-defined area and make sure that every object you buy blows everything else out of the water.
Speaking of landscapes, one wall alternates (uncle) Saloman van Ruysdael and (nephew) Jacob van Ruisdael. Not too many of the world's great museums can match these four paintings.
European painting and sculpture curator J. Patrice Marandel recently told The New York Times he's looking for Flemish paintings. It's not hard to see why. The Flemish baroque room is low-wattage compared to the Dutch collection. Not so long ago, the museum's most notable Flemish painting was a van Dyck Andromeda, said to be one of just two nudes by the artist. The museum has since decided it's not a van Dyck at all, and it's somewhere in storage. The second-most interesting Flemish painting, the Sweerts Plague in an Ancient City, is now shunted to the Italian baroque room. Sweerts painted it in Rome.
A French gallery is built around the great de La Tour Magdalene. In the past, Marandel has spoken of giving greater prominence the Andrew S. Ciechanowiecki collection of 46 oil sketches, acquired in 2000. The Ciechanowiecki pieces tend to be religious or history paintings by minor classicists rather then the later, plein-air landscapes that have set collectors and museums abuzz. The new installation works well enough mainstreaming Ciechanowiecki "sketches" alongside actual "paintings." In many cases, the distinction isn't apparent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7da8/e7da83baf869a77a00bed115fd87d050e33a00e8" alt=""
The rooms may not be memorable, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. The Saenredam white cube is a perfect machine for viewing Dutch art. The walls diffuse the overhead light (artificial), offering equal opportunity for every hue of the Dutch palette. The Carter paintings, the Rembrandts, the Magdalene — all look better than you've ever seen them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec9d8/ec9d8503534b5cf95ca09beedf2d9e41705b4145" alt=""
There's more to come. The museum will be showing Italian paintings alongside Roman antiquities in a long gallery, said to be the largest for Italian baroque art in the U.S. More alarming: There's been talk of using the appalling fake-stucco wall treatment of the Luis Melendez show for the permanent galleries. In an unopened room, they're now hanging LACMA paintings on walls reminiscent of Old Madrid. Yikes!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff383/ff383201922013e500b1e9097698ed90349af2e7" alt=""
Comments
Anybody know?
runrrr@adelphia.net